Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29080680›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of investigative dermatology2018

Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR).

Ireny Y K Iskandar, Richard B Warren, Mark Lunt, Kayleigh J Mason, Ian Evans, Kathleen McElhone, Catherine H Smith, Nick J Reynolds, Darren M Ashcroft, Christopher E M Griffiths and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictors of clinical response to biologics in psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Impact of the pre-biologic treatment journey on biologic drug survival in psoriasis: A nationwide cohort study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. The Role of Epigenetic Factors in the Pathogenesis of Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ireny Y K IskandarCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: ireny.iskandar@manchester.ac.uk.
Richard B WarrenDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mark LuntArthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kayleigh J MasonDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ian EvansDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kathleen McElhoneDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Catherine H SmithSt. John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nick J ReynoldsInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Medical School, Newcastle University, NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Darren M AshcroftCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Christopher E M GriffithsDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: christopher.griffiths@manchester.ac.uk.
BADBIR Study Group
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L011808/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the drug survival of second-line biologic therapies for psoriasis in routine clinical practice. We assessed drug survival of second-line biologic therapies and estimated the risk of recurrent discontinuation due to adverse events or ineffectiveness in patients with psoriasis who had failed a first biologic therapy and switched to a second in a large, multicenter pharmacovigilance registry (n = 1,239; adalimumab, n = 538; etanercept, n = 104; ustekinumab, n = 597). The overall drug survival rate in the first year after switching was 77% (95% confidence interval = 74-79%), falling to 58% (55-61%) in the third year. Female sex, multiple comorbidities, concomitant therapy with cyclosporine, and a high Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at switching to the second-line biologic therapy were predictors of overall discontinuation (multivariable Cox proportional hazard model). Compared to adalimumab, patients receiving etanercept were more likely to discontinue therapy (hazard ratio = 1.87, 95% confidence interval = 1.24-2.83), whereas patients receiving ustekinumab were more likely to persist (hazard ratio = 0.46; 95% confidence interval = 0.33-0.64). Discontinuation of the first biologic therapy because of adverse events was associated with an increased rate of second drug discontinuation because of adverse events (hazard ratio = 2.55; 95% confidence interval = 1.50-4.32). In conclusion, drug survival rates differed among biologic therapies and decreased over time; second-line discontinuation because of adverse events was more common among those who discontinued first-line treatment for this reason. The results of this study should support clinical decision making when choosing second-line biologic therapy for patients with psoriasis.

Indexed as

DermatologyRegistriesSocieties, MedicalAdalimumabAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiological ProductsDrug SubstitutionEtanerceptFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPsoriasisAdalimumabAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiological ProductsEtanerceptImmunosuppressive AgentsUstekinumab

Identifiers

PMID29080680
PMCPMC5869053
OpenAlexW2765851545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.