Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29080435›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2017

Specialty training for the retention of Malawian doctors: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Kate L Mandeville, Kara Hanson, Adamson S Muula, Titha Dzowela, Godwin Ulaya, Mylène Lagarde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Specialties preference by gender among medical students at Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kate L MandevilleDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kate.mandeville@lshtm.ac.uk.
Kara HansonDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Adamson S MuulaDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Titha DzowelaDepartment of Clinical Services, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Godwin UlayaJohns Hopkins Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mylène LagardeDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few medical schools and sustained emigration have led to low numbers of doctors in many sub-Saharan African countries. The opportunity to undertake specialty training has been shown to be particularly important in retaining doctors. Yet limited training capacity means that doctors are often sent to other countries to specialise, increasing the risk that they may not return. Expanding domestic training, however, may be constrained by the reluctance of doctors to accept training in their home country. We modelled different policy options in an example country, Malawi, to examine the cost-effectiveness of expanding specialty training to retain doctors in sub-Saharan Africa. We designed a Markov model of the physician labour market in Malawi, incorporating data from graduate tracing studies in 2006 and 2012, a 2013 discrete choice experiment on 148 Malawian doctors and 2015 cost data. A government perspective was taken with a time horizon of 40 years. Expanded specialty training in Malawi or South Africa with increasing mandatory service before training was compared against baseline conditions. The outcome measures were cost per doctor-year and cost per specialist-year spent working in the Malawian public sector. Expanding specialty training in Malawi is more cost-effective than training outside Malawi. At least two years of mandatory service would be more cost-effective, with five years adding the most value in terms of doctor-years. After 40 years of expanded specialty training in Malawi, the medical workforce would be over fifty percent larger with over six times the number of specialists compared to current trends. However, the government would need to be willing to pay at least 3.5 times more per doctor-year for a 5% increase and a third more per specialist-year for a four-fold increase. Greater returns are possible from doctors with more flexible training preferences. Sustained funding of specialty training may improve retention in sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionAfrica South of the SaharaChoice BehaviorCost-Benefit AnalysisDeveloping CountriesEducation, Medical, ContinuingHealth PolicyHumansPhysiciansSpecializationTeachingCost-effectiveness analysisDiscrete choice experimentEducation medicalHuman resources for healthMalawiPhysiciansSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID29080435
PMCPMC5710765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.