Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29080110›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2018

Outpatient groin hernia repair: assessment of 9330 patients from the French "Club Hernie" database.

F Drissi, F Jurczak, J P Cossa, J F Gillion, C Baayen, For “Club Hernie”

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. [Outpatient treatment for hernia surgery in Germany].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Unplanned readmissions after hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F DrissiClinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne (CCDE), Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), Hôtel Dieu, CHU Nantes, Place Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes Cedex 1, France. farouk.drissi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-7608
F JurczakChirurgie générale et Digestive, Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire, Cité sanitaire, 11 boulevard Georges Charpak, 44606, Saint Nazaire, France.
J P CossaChirurgie Générale et Digestive, CMC Georges Bizet, 23 rue Georges Bizet, 75116, Paris, France.
J F GillionUnité de Chirurgie Viscérale et Digestive, Hôpital Privé d'Antony, 1, Rue Velpeau, 92160, Antony, France.
C BaayenEA 4725 SPHERE « methodS in Patient-centered outcomes & HEalth ResEarch » , Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
For “Club Hernie”
Zimmer Biomet (France) · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRClinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGroin hernia repair (GHR) is one of the most frequent surgical interventions practiced worldwide. Outpatient surgery for GHR is known to be safe and effective.

aimTo assess the outpatient practice for GHR in France and identify predictive factors of failure.

methodForty one surgeons of the French "Club Hernie" prospectively gathered data concerning successive GHR over a period of 4 years within a multicenter database.

resultsA total of 9330 patients were operated on during the period of the study. Mean age was 61.8 (1-100) years old and 8245 patients (88.4%) were males. 6974 GHR (74.7%) were performed as outpatient procedures. In 262 patients (3.6%), the outpatient setting, previously selected, did not succeed. Upon multivariate analysis, predictive factors of ambulatory failure were ASA grade ≥ III (OR 0.42, p < 0.001), bilateral GHR (OR 0.47, p < 0.001), emergency surgery for incarcerated hernia (OR 0.10, p < 0.001), spinal anesthesia (OR 0.27, p < 0.001) and occurrence of an early post-operative complication (OR 0.07, p < 0.001). The more frequent complications were acute urinary retention and surgical site collections. 2094 patients (21.5%) were not selected preoperatively for 1-day surgery.

conclusionMore than 74% of the patients benefited from outpatient surgery for GHR with a poor failure rate. Predictive factors of outpatient GHR failure were ASA grade ≥ III, bilateral GHR, emergency surgery for incarcerated hernia, spinal anesthesia and occurrence of an early post-operative complication. Ambulatory failures were often related to social issues or medical complications. Outpatient surgery criteria could become less restrictive in the future.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleFranceGroinHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansInfantMaleAmbulatoryGroin hernia repairLaparoscopic groin hernia repairOutpatient

Identifiers

PMID29080110
OpenAlexW2766825006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.