Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29080100›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Effects of free choice and outcome valence on the sense of agency: evidence from measures of intentional binding and feelings of control.

Zeynep Barlas, William E Hockley, Sukhvinder S Obhi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The effect of experimenter identification on (dis)obedience and its mechanisms.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Temporal dynamics of cue integration for sense of agency in social comparative context.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Instrumental responses and Pavlovian stimuli as temporal referents in a peak procedure.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zeynep BarlasSocial Cognitive Systems Group, Cluster of Excellence Center, Cognitive Interactive Technology (CITEC), Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1, 33619, Bielefeld, Germany. zbarlas@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2789-1950
William E HockleyCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Sukhvinder S ObhiCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada. obhi@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN5484-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday actions can be characterized by whether they are freely chosen or commanded by external stimuli, and whether they produce pleasant or unpleasant outcomes. To assess how these aspects of actions affect the sense of agency, we asked participants to perform freely selected or instructed key presses which could produce pleasant or unpleasant chords. We obtained estimates of the key press-chord intervals and ratings of the feeling of control (FoC) over the outcomes. Interval estimates were used to assess intentional binding-the perceived temporal attraction between actions and their outcomes. Results showed stronger binding and higher FoC ratings in the free compared to instructed condition. Additionally, FoC was stronger for pleasant compared to unpleasant outcomes, and for pleasant outcomes that were produced by freely selected compared to instructed actions. These results highlight the importance of free choice and outcome valence on the SoA. They also reveal how freedom of action selection and pleasantness of action-outcomes can interact to affect the FoC.

Indexed as

IntentionInternal-External ControlAdolescentAdultChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceTime PerceptionYoung AdultAction selectionFreedomIntentional bindingOutcome valenceSense of agency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.