ArticlePediatric cardiology2018
Preserved Cardiac Blood Supply-Workload Balance in Pediatric Patients After Aortic Arch Repair.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vascular aging in adult congenital heart disease-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most important problems in patients with aortic coarctation after aortic arch repair is future cardiovascular disease. We have previously reported that the enhancement of aortic pressure wave reflection in patients could be one of the causes of future cardiovascular diseases, because it results in an increase of the left ventricular workload and is disadvantageous for coronary circulation. Seventeen patients who had undergone aortic arch repair without pressure gradient in their aortic arch were enrolled. An ascending aortic pressure waveform was recorded by a pressure-sensor-mounted catheter, and a subendocardial viability ratio, which measures cardiac blood supply-workload balance, was calculated. The values were compared with those in age-matched controls. The patients' mean age was 6.8 ± 2.8 years. The mean ascending aortic systolic pressure was higher (100.4 ± 12.9 vs. 90.2 ± 8.9 mmHg, p = 0.0011) and the pulse pressure was wider (38.1 ± 7.1 vs. 32.5 ± 5.4 mmHg, p = 0.0072) in patients than in control subjects. There was no difference in the mean subendocardial viability ratio (1.01 ± 0.25 vs. 1.01 ± 0.24, ns), while the mean tension time index (27.4 ± 5.6 vs. 23.0 ± 3.3, p = 0.0001) and diastolic pressure time index (28.4 ± 11.1 vs. 23.6 ± 8.0, p = 0.0082) were higher in patients than in controls. The cardiac blood supply-workload balance was preserved in patients after aortic arch repair, despite an increase in their cardiac workload.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.