Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079917›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2018

Permissive hypotensive resuscitation in adult patients with traumatic haemorrhagic shock: a systematic review.

Mohammed Albreiki, David Voegeli

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Bimodal distribution of trauma-related acute kidney injury (TrAKI): A clinical review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammed AlbreikiFaculty of Health Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. albreiki1@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-4840
David VoegeliFaculty of Health Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Sultan Qaboos University Hospital · OMUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPermissive hypotensive resuscitation (PHR) is an advancing concept aiming towards deliberative balanced resuscitation whilst treating severely injured patients, and its effectiveness on the survival rate remains unexplored. This detailed systematic review aims to critically evaluate the available literature that investigates the effects of PHR on survival rate.

methodsA systematic review design searched for comparative and non-comparative studies using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web-of-Science and CENTRAL. Full-text articles on adult trauma patients with low blood pressure were considered for inclusion. The risk of bias and a critical appraisal of the identified articles were performed to assess the quality of the selected studies. Included studies were sorted into comparative and non-comparative studies to ease the process of analysis. Mortality rates of PHR were calculated for both groups of studies.

resultsFrom the 869 articles that were initially identified, ten studies were selected for review, including randomised control trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. By applying the risk of bias assessment and critique tools, the methodologies of the selected articles ranged from moderate to high quality. The mortality rates among patients resuscitated with low volume and large volume in the selected RCTs were 21.5% (123/570) and 28.6% (168/587) respectively, whilst the total mortality rate of the patients enrolled in three non-comparative studies was 9.97% (279/2797).

conclusionsThe death rate amongst post-trauma patients managed with conservative resuscitation was lower than standard aggressive resuscitation, which indicates that PHR can create better survival rate among traumatised patients. Therefore, PHR is a feasible and safely practiced fluid resuscitative strategy to manage haemorrhagic shock in pre-hospital and in-hospital settings. Further trials on PHR are required to assess its effectiveness on the survival rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaAdultHumansResuscitationShock, HemorrhagicSurvival AnalysisHypovolemic shockPermissive hypotensive resuscitationSurvivalTrauma

Identifiers

PMID29079917
PMCPMC5884894
OpenAlexW2612990969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.