Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079907›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2017

[Urodynamic studies prior to urinary incontinence surgery : What is useful?]

A Kaufmann

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

A KaufmannZentrum für Kontinenz und Neuro-Urologie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Viersener Straße 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland. albert.kaufmann@mariahilf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery is often necessary after failure of conservative therapy for urinary incontinence. Guidelines recommend urodynamic studies before surgery. A distinction is made between non-invasive (uroflowmetry) and invasive methods (cystometry and pressure-flow study, if necessary as combined videourodynamics, as well as urethral pressure profile). All examinations serve to objectify and quantify the symptoms, to correctly assign symptoms to the pathophysiology and anatomy as well as to identify risk factors, which often have a significant influence on the success of surgical therapy. Given appropriate experience, complications and often significant sequelae of bladder dysfunction affecting the patient's quality of life and life expectancy can be recognized. Urodynamic studies are performed to help narrow down potential diagnoses, to develop therapeutic strategies, and to obtain prognostic parameters. The following article is intended to provide some support.

Indexed as

AgedBenzilatesCombined Modality TherapyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleNortropanesPostoperative ComplicationsProstatectomyRisk FactorsSuburethral SlingsUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary IncontinenceBenzilatesNortropanestrospium chloridePost-ProstatectomyProlapseUrinary bladder diseasesUrinary incontinence, stressUrination disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.