Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079842›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3D ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-CT and 9.4T MRI.

Johannes Linxweiler, Christina Körbel, Andreas Müller, Eva Jüngel, Roman Blaheta, Joana Heinzelmann, Michael Stöckle, Kerstin Junker, Michael D Menger, Matthias Saar

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes LinxweilerDepartment of Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany. johannes.linxweiler@uks.eu.
Christina KörbelInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Andreas MüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Eva JüngelDepartment of Urology, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Roman BlahetaDepartment of Urology, Frankfurt University Medical Center, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Joana HeinzelmannDepartment of Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Michael StöckleDepartment of Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Kerstin JunkerDepartment of Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Michael D MengerInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Matthias SaarDepartment of Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Saarland University · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to comparatively evaluate high-resolution 3D ultrasonography (hrUS), in-vivo micro-CT (μCT) and 9.4T MRI for the monitoring of tumor growth in an orthotopic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) xenograft model since there is a lack of validated, non-invasive imaging tools for this purpose. 1 × 10

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticMagnetic Resonance ImagingX-Ray MicrotomographyAnimalsCarcinoma, Renal CellCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMiceNeoplasm MetastasisSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID29079842
PMCPMC5660163
OpenAlexW2765571248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.