Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Eye-Head Coordination in 31 Space Shuttle Astronauts during Visual Target Acquisition.

Millard F Reschke, Ognyan I Kolev, Gilles Clément

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Neural Vision Restoration in Ophthalmology.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Modality-Independent Effect of Gravity in Shaping the Internal Representation of 3D Space for Visual and Haptic Object Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Changes in gain of horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex during spaceflight.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Millard F ReschkeNeuroscience Laboratories, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ognyan I KolevNeuroscience Laboratories, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gilles ClémentLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Bron, France. gilles.r.clement@nasa.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between 1989 and 1995, NASA evaluated how increases in flight duration of up to 17 days affected the health and performance of Space Shuttle astronauts. Thirty-one Space Shuttle pilots participating in 17 space missions were tested at 3 different times before flight and 3 different times after flight, starting within a few hours of return to Earth. The astronauts moved their head and eyes as quickly as possible from the central fixation point to a specified target located 20°, 30°, or 60° off center. Eye movements were measured with electro-oculography (EOG). Head movements were measured with a triaxial rate sensor system mounted on a headband. The mean time to visually acquire the targets immediately after landing was 7-10% (30-34 ms) slower than mean preflight values, but results returned to baseline after 48 hours. This increase in gaze latency was due to a decrease in velocity and amplitude of both the eye saccade and head movement toward the target. Results were similar after all space missions, regardless of length.

Indexed as

AstronautsEye MovementsHead MovementsMotor SkillsSpace FlightAdultEye Movement MeasurementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationPilotsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29079792
PMCPMC5660216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.