Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079786›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2017

Optimization of large animal MI models; a systematic analysis of control groups from preclinical studies.

P P Zwetsloot, L H J A Kouwenberg, E S Sena, J E Eding, H M den Ruijter, J P G Sluijter, G Pasterkamp, P A Doevendans, I E Hoefer, S A J Chamuleau and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Anesthesia Protocols used to Create Ischemia Reperfusion Myocardial Infarcts in Swine.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

P P ZwetslootDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. P.P.M.Zwetsloot@umcutrecht.nl.
L H J A KouwenbergDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E S SenaCenter for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3282-8502
J E EdingHubrecht Institute, Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen (KNAW), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H M den RuijterDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J P G SluijterDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G PasterkampDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P A DoevendansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
I E HoeferDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S A J ChamuleauDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G P J van HoutDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S J Jansen Of LorkeersDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large animal models are essential for the development of novel therapeutics for myocardial infarction. To optimize translation, we need to assess the effect of experimental design on disease outcome and model experimental design to resemble the clinical course of MI. The aim of this study is therefore to systematically investigate how experimental decisions affect outcome measurements in large animal MI models. We used control animal-data from two independent meta-analyses of large animal MI models. All variables of interest were pre-defined. We performed univariable and multivariable meta-regression to analyze whether these variables influenced infarct size and ejection fraction. Our analyses incorporated 246 relevant studies. Multivariable meta-regression revealed that infarct size and cardiac function were influenced independently by choice of species, sex, co-medication, occlusion type, occluded vessel, quantification method, ischemia duration and follow-up duration. We provide strong systematic evidence that commonly used endpoints significantly depend on study design and biological variation. This makes direct comparison of different study-results difficult and calls for standardized models. Researchers should take this into account when designing large animal studies to most closely mimic the clinical course of MI and enable translational success.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMyocardial InfarctionAnimalsRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29079786
PMCPMC5660150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.