Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079755›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A proteome view of structural, functional, and taxonomic characteristics of major protein domain clusters.

Chia-Tsen Sun, Austin W T Chiang, Ming-Jing Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chia-Tsen SunInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Austin W T ChiangInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Ming-Jing HwangInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, 112, Taiwan. mjhwang@ibms.sinica.edu.tw.
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteome-scale bioinformatics research is increasingly conducted as the number of completely sequenced genomes increases, but analysis of protein domains (PDs) usually relies on similarity in their amino acid sequences and/or three-dimensional structures. Here, we present results from a bi-clustering analysis on presence/absence data for 6,580 unique PDs in 2,134 species with a sequenced genome, thus covering a complete set of proteins, for the three superkingdoms of life, Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya. Our analysis revealed eight distinctive PD clusters, which, following an analysis of enrichment of Gene Ontology functions and CATH classification of protein structures, were shown to exhibit structural and functional properties that are taxa-characteristic. For examples, the largest cluster is ubiquitous in all three superkingdoms, constituting a set of 1,472 persistent domains created early in evolution and retained in living organisms and characterized by basic cellular functions and ancient structural architectures, while an Archaea and Eukarya bi-superkingdom cluster suggests its PDs may have existed in the ancestor of the two superkingdoms, and others are single superkingdom- or taxa (e.g. Fungi)-specific. These results contribute to increase our appreciation of PD diversity and our knowledge of how PDs are used in species, yielding implications on species evolution.

Indexed as

ProteomicsClassificationCluster AnalysisEvolution, MolecularMolecular Sequence AnnotationProtein DomainsProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID29079755
PMCPMC5660162
OpenAlexW2766497234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.