Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079743›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The avian egg exhibits general allometric invariances in mechanical design.

Jia-Yang Juang, Pin-Yi Chen, Da-Chang Yang, Shang-Ping Wu, An Yen, Hsin-I Hsieh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parental provisioning drives brain size in birds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Ancient proteins resolve controversy over the identity ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jia-Yang JuangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. jiayang@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0001-6801-3244
Pin-Yi ChenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan.
Da-Chang YangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan.
Shang-Ping WuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan.
An YenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan.
Hsin-I HsiehTaipei Zoo, Taipei, 11656, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University of Science and Technology · TWTaipei Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The avian egg exhibits extraordinary diversity in size, shape and color, and has a key role in avian adaptive radiations. Despite extensive work, our understanding of the underlying principles that guide the "design" of the egg as a load-bearing structure remains incomplete, especially over broad taxonomic scales. Here we define a dimensionless number C, a function of egg weight, stiffness and dimensions, to quantify how stiff an egg is with respect to its weight after removing geometry-induced rigidity. We analyze eggs of 463 bird species in 36 orders across five orders of magnitude in body mass, and find that C number is nearly invariant for most species, including tiny hummingbirds and giant elephant birds. This invariance or "design guideline" dictates that evolutionary changes in shell thickness and Young's modulus, both contributing to shell stiffness, are constrained by changes in egg weight. Our analysis illuminates unique reproductive strategies of brood parasites, kiwis, and megapodes, and quantifies the loss of safety margin for contact incubation due to artificial selection and environmental toxins. Our approach provides a mechanistic framework for a better understanding of the mechanical design of the avian egg, and may provide clues to the evolutionary origin of contact incubation of amniote eggs.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBirdsBody SizeExtinction, BiologicalOvumSafetyToxins, BiologicalToxins, Biological

Identifiers

PMID29079743
PMCPMC5660176
OpenAlexW2766851017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.