Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079701›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2017

Mutational signatures of non-homologous and polymerase theta-mediated end-joining in embryonic stem cells.

Joost Schimmel, Hanneke Kool, Robin van Schendel, Marcel Tijsterman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In vivo systematic detection of the outcomes of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated DNA repair in skeletal muscle stem cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dynamic Assemblies in Genome Maintenance.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Disruption of Microhomology-mediated End-joining in Ewing Sarcoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Evolutionary Potential of Chromoanagenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joost SchimmelDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2620-4349
Hanneke KoolDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robin van SchendelDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marcel TijstermanDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands m.tijsterman@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8465-9002
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells employ potentially mutagenic DNA repair mechanisms to avoid the detrimental effects of chromosome breaks on cell survival. While classical non-homologous end-joining (cNHEJ) is largely error-free, alternative end-joining pathways have been described that are intrinsically mutagenic. Which end-joining mechanisms operate in germ and embryonic cells and thus contribute to heritable mutations found in congenital diseases is, however, still largely elusive. Here, we determined the genetic requirements for the repair of CRISPR/Cas9-induced chromosomal breaks of different configurations, and establish the mutational consequences. We find that cNHEJ and polymerase theta-mediated end-joining (TMEJ) act both parallel and redundant in mouse embryonic stem cells and account for virtually all end-joining activity. Surprisingly, mutagenic repair by polymerase theta (Pol θ, encoded by the

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Polymerase betaDNA Polymerase thetaEmbryonic Stem CellsHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseMiceModels, GeneticMutationDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase betaDNA polymerase beta2DNA polymerase muDNA Polymerase thetaHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferasecNHEJCRISPR/Cas9double‐strand break repairembryonic stem cellspolymerase theta‐mediated end joining

Identifiers

PMID29079701
PMCPMC5730883
OpenAlexW2765241881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.