ArticleEMBO reports2017
Don't just dump your data and run: Authors should submit as much experimental information as possible when uploading sequence data.
Article in EMBO reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A computational framework for extracting biological insights from SRA cancer data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Protocol variations in run-on transcription dataset preparation produce detectable signatures in sequencing libraries.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Co-cultivation, Co-culture, Mixed Culture, and Microbial Consortium of Fungi: An Understudied Strategy for Biomass Conversion.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- The archives are half-empty: an assessment of the availability of microbial community sequencing data.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Fungal Community Ecology Using MALDI-TOF MS Demands Curated Mass Spectral Databases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Improving Reproducibility and Candidate Selection in Transcriptomics Using Meta-analysis.Journal of experimental neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.