Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079602›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol.

Sonia Johnson, Oliver Mason, David Osborn, Alyssa Milton, Claire Henderson, Louise Marston, Gareth Ambler, Rachael Hunter, Stephen Pilling, Nicola Morant and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peer-based interventions targeting suicide prevention: A scoping review.American journal of community psychology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2219-1384
Oliver MasonSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, London, UK.
David OsbornDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Alyssa MiltonSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-0123
Claire HendersonHealth Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK.
Louise MarstonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Gareth AmblerDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
Rachael HunterDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-8934
Stephen PillingR & D Department, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nicola MorantDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Richard GraySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Tim WeaverSchool of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London, UK.
Fiona NolanCentre for Outcomes, Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBKing's College London · GBLa Trobe University · AUMiddlesex University · GBThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0109-10078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCrisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide assessment and intensive home treatment in a crisis, aiming to offer an alternative for people who would otherwise require a psychiatric inpatient admission. They are available in most areas in England. Despite some evidence for their clinical and cost-effectiveness, recurrent concerns are expressed regarding discontinuity with other services and lack of focus on preventing future relapse and readmission to acute care. Currently evidence on how to prevent readmissions to acute care is limited. Self-management interventions, involving supporting service users in recognising and managing signs of their own illness and in actively planning their recovery, have some supporting evidence, but have not been tested as a means of preventing readmission to acute care in people leaving community crisis care. We thus proposed the current study to test the effectiveness of such an intervention. We selected peer support workers as the preferred staff to deliver such an intervention, as they are well-placed to model and encourage active and autonomous recovery from mental health problems. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CORE (CRT Optimisation and Relapse Prevention) self-management trial compares the effectiveness of a peer-provided self-management intervention for people leaving CRT care, with treatment as usual supplemented by a booklet on self-management. The planned sample is 440 participants, including 40 participants in an internal pilot. The primary outcome measure is whether participants are readmitted to acute care over 1 year of follow-up following entry to the trial. Secondary outcomes include self-rated recovery at 4 and at 18 months following trial entry, measured using the Questionnaire on the Process of Recovery. Analysis will follow an intention to treatment principle. Random effects logistic regression modelling with adjustment for clustering by peer support worker will be used to test the primary hypothesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CORE self-management trial was approved by the London Camden and Islington Research Ethics Committee (REC ref: 12/LO/0988). A Trial Steering Committee and Data Monitoring Committee oversee the progress of the study. We will report on the results of the clinical trial, as well as on the characteristics of the participants and their associations with relapse. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 01027104;pre-results stage.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisPatient Care TeamPeer GroupSelf-ManagementAcute DiseaseAftercareCrisis InterventionFemaleHumansLondonMaleMental DisordersPatient ReadmissionRecurrenceResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnairescrisis resolution teamshome treatmentPeer supportrandomised controlled trialrelapse preventionself-management

Identifiers

PMID29079602
PMCPMC5665309
OpenAlexW2767158168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.