Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079167›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2018

Failure After Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study of 18,065 Knees.

Michael Pitta, Christina I Esposito, Zhichang Li, Yuo-Yu Lee, Timothy M Wright, Douglas E Padgett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for treating fractures of the distal femur in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Outcomes of locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic distal femur fractures after TKA.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael PittaAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Christina I EspositoAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Zhichang LiAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Arthritis Clinic and Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yuo-Yu LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Timothy M WrightAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Douglas E PadgettAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Funding

The Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics *U18HS016075 · AHRQ · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MUSHLIN, ALVIN MUSHLIN · 2006 to 2010
$4.0M
AHRQ HHS U18 HS016075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought is to determine the mechanism of failure among primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed at a single high-volume institution by asking the following research questions: (1) What are the most common failure modes for modern TKA designs? and (2) What are the preoperative risk factors for failure following primary TKA?

methodsFrom May 2007 to December 2012, 18,065 primary TKAs performed on 16,083 patients at a single institution were recorded in a prospective total joint arthroplasty registry with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed patient charts to determine a cause of failure for primary TKAs. A cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the risk of revision surgery following primary TKA.

resultsThe most common reasons for failure within 2 years after TKA were infection and stiffness. The multivariable regression identified the following preoperative risk factors for TKA failure: history of drug abuse (hazard ratio [HR] 4.68; P = 0.03), deformity/mechanical preoperative diagnosis (HR 3.52; P < .01), having a constrained condylar knee implant over posterior-stabilized implant (HR 1.99; P < .01), post-traumatic/trauma preoperative diagnosis (HR 1.78; P = .03), and younger age (HR 0.61; P < .01)

conclusionThese findings add to the growing data that primary TKAs are no longer failing from polyethylene wear-related issues. This study identified preoperative risk factors for failure of primary TKAs, which may be useful information for developing strategies to improve outcomes following TKA.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsProsthesis FailureAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedPolyethyleneProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesPolyethylenearthrofibrosisaseptic looseninginstabilityosteolysisprimary total knee arthroplasty failure

Identifiers

PMID29079167
PMCPMC5794604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.