Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29079118›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2018

Full Monte Carlo-Based Biologic Treatment Plan Optimization System for Intensity Modulated Carbon Ion Therapy on Graphics Processing Unit.

Nan Qin, Chenyang Shen, Min-Yu Tsai, Marco Pinto, Zhen Tian, Georgios Dedes, Arnold Pompos, Steve B Jiang, Katia Parodi, Xun Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fixed Beamline Optimization for Intensity Modulated Carbon-Ion Therapy.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nan QinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Chenyang ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Min-Yu TsaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Marco PintoDepartment of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Zhen TianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Georgios DedesDepartment of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Arnold PomposDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Steve B JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Katia ParodiDepartment of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Xun JiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: Xun.Jia@utsouthwestern.edu.

Funding

National Particle Therapy Research Center (NPTRC)P20CA183639 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2015 to 2016
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA183639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOne of the major benefits of carbon ion therapy is enhanced biological effectiveness at the Bragg peak region. For intensity modulated carbon ion therapy (IMCT), it is desirable to use Monte Carlo (MC) methods to compute the properties of each pencil beam spot for treatment planning, because of their accuracy in modeling physics processes and estimating biological effects. We previously developed goCMC, a graphics processing unit (GPU)-oriented MC engine for carbon ion therapy. The purpose of the present study was to build a biological treatment plan optimization system using goCMC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The repair-misrepair-fixation model was implemented to compute the spatial distribution of linear-quadratic model parameters for each spot. A treatment plan optimization module was developed to minimize the difference between the prescribed and actual biological effect. We used a gradient-based algorithm to solve the optimization problem. The system was embedded in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system under a client-server architecture to achieve a user-friendly planning environment. We tested the system with a 1-dimensional homogeneous water case and 3 3-dimensional patient cases.

resultsOur system generated treatment plans with biological spread-out Bragg peaks covering the targeted regions and sparing critical structures. Using 4 NVidia GTX 1080 GPUs, the total computation time, including spot simulation, optimization, and final dose calculation, was 0.6 hour for the prostate case (8282 spots), 0.2 hour for the pancreas case (3795 spots), and 0.3 hour for the brain case (6724 spots). The computation time was dominated by MC spot simulation.

conclusionsWe built a biological treatment plan optimization system for IMCT that performs simulations using a fast MC engine, goCMC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that full MC-based IMCT inverse planning has been achieved in a clinically viable time frame.

Indexed as

Monte Carlo MethodAlgorithmsHeavy Ion RadiotherapyHumansLinear ModelsMaleOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPancreatic NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRelative Biological EffectivenessUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID29079118
PMCPMC5736444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.