Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29078904›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2017

Surgeon attitudes and practice patterns in managing small bowel obstruction: a qualitative analysis.

Lucas W Thornblade, Anjali R Truitt, Giana H Davidson, David R Flum, Danielle C Lavallee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Safety of Expectant Management for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. GI Surgical Emergencies: Scope and Burden of Disease.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucas W ThornbladeDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: lucaswt@uw.edu.
Anjali R TruittDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Giana H DavidsonDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
David R FlumDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Danielle C LavalleeDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Renewal: Gastrointestinal Surgery Outcomes Research FellowshipT32DK070555 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FLUM, DAVID R · 2010 to 2024
$3.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK070555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorical training instructs surgeons to, "never let the sun set on a small bowel obstruction (SBO)" due to concern for bowel ischemia. However, the routine use of computed tomography scans for ruling out ischemia provides the opportunity for trial of nonoperative management, allowing time for resolution of adhesive SBO. In light of advances in practice, little is known about how surgeons manage these patients, in particular, whether there is consistency in the stated duration for safe nonoperative management.

methodsUsing a case vignette (a patient with computed tomography scan diagnosed complete SBO without bowel ischemia), we interviewed a purposive sample of general surgeons practicing in Washington State to understand stated approaches to clinical management. Interview questions addressed typical practice, preferred timing of surgery, and approach. We conducted a content analysis to understand current practice and attitudes.

resultsWe interviewed 15 surgeons practicing across Washington State. Surgical practice patterns for patients with SBO varied widely. The period of time that surgeons were willing to manage patients nonoperatively ranged from 1-7 d. Interviews revealed insight into surgical decision-making, the importance of patient preferences, variation in practice, and evidence gaps. All surgeons acknowledged a lack of evidence to support appropriate management of patients with SBO.

conclusionsInterviews with practicing surgeons highlight a changing paradigm away from routine early surgery for patients with adhesive SBO. However, there is lack of consensus in the appropriate duration of nonoperative management and practices vary considerably. These revealed attitudes inform the feasibility and design of future randomized studies of patients with adhesive SBO.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'FemaleHumansIntestinal ObstructionLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceSurgeonsWatchful WaitingClinical decision-makingClinical practice patternsDiagnostic imagingIntestinal obstructionSmall bowel obstructionSmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID29078904
PMCPMC5679108
OpenAlexW2739114914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.