Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29078815›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2017

Study protocol: incentives for increased access to comprehensive family planning for urban youth using a benefits card in Uganda. A quasi-experimental study.

Afra Nuwasiima, Elly Nuwamanya, Patricia Navvuga, Janet U Babigumira, Francis T Asiimwe, Solomon J Lubinga, Joseph B Babigumira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Afra NuwasiimaGlobal Health Economics Ltd, P.O Box 27011, Kampala, Uganda. anuwasiima@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3931-7737
Elly NuwamanyaGlobal Health Economics Ltd, P.O Box 27011, Kampala, Uganda.
Patricia NavvugaGlobal Health Economics Ltd, P.O Box 27011, Kampala, Uganda.
Janet U BabigumiraGlobal Health Economics Ltd, P.O Box 27011, Kampala, Uganda.
Francis T AsiimweGlobal Health Economics Ltd, P.O Box 27011, Kampala, Uganda.
Solomon J LubingaPharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, P.O. Box 357630, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Joseph B BabigumiraPharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, P.O. Box 357630, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
World Health Organization - Uganda · UGCenter for Global Development · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of contraception is one of the most cost-effective public health interventions and has the potential to prevent about 30% of maternal and 10% of child deaths in developing countries. Voucher-based initiatives for family planning are an effective and viable means of increasing contraceptive use. In this paper, we present a protocol for a pilot study of a novel incentive, a family planning benefits card (FPBC) program to increase uptake of family planning services among urban poor youth in Uganda while leveraging private sector funding.

methodsThe study employs both impact and health economic evaluation methods to assess the effect of the FPBC program. We propose a quasi-experimental study design with two separate pre- and post-samples to measure program effectiveness. The main outcome of the impact evaluation is the percentage change in the prevalence of modern contraceptive use and unmet need for contraception. We will also conduct model-based incremental cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses. The main outcomes of the economic evaluation are the cost per enrolled youth and cost per pregnancy averted, and cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. We will also pilot a corporate social responsibility model of sponsorship for the FPBC program in partnership with local corporations. Budget impact analysis will examine the potential affordability of scaling up the FPBC program and the fiscal implications of this scale up to the corporate social responsibility (CSR) budgets of partner corporations, the government, and the individual taxpayer. DISCUSSION: In this study, we propose an impact and economic evaluation to establish the proof concept of using a FPBC program to increase uptake of family planning services among urban poor youth in Uganda. The results of this study will present stakeholders in Uganda and internationally with a potentially viable option for corporate-sponsored access to family planning in urban poor communities.

trial registrationMUREC1/7 No. 10/05-17. Registered 19th July 2017.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultContraceptionCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePilot ProjectsSex EducationUgandaUrban PopulationYoung AdultBenefits cardContraceptive useCorporate social responsibilityEconomic evaluationFamily planningImpact evaluationSlumsYouth

Identifiers

PMID29078815
PMCPMC5659021
OpenAlexW2766006768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.