Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29078769›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2017

This moral coil: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian medical student attitudes toward medical assistance in dying.

Eli Xavier Bator, Bethany Philpott, Andrew Paul Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Attitude towards Euthanasia among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hong Kong.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eli Xavier BatorMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Waterloo Regional Campus, McMaster University, 10B Victoria St S, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1C5, Canada. eli.bator@hotmail.com.
Bethany PhilpottMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Waterloo Regional Campus, McMaster University, 10B Victoria St S, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1C5, Canada.
Andrew Paul CostaMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Waterloo Regional Campus, McMaster University, 10B Victoria St S, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1C5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn February, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down the ban on medical assistance in dying (MAiD). In June, 2016, the federal government passed Bill C-14, permitting MAiD. Current medical students will be the first physician cohort to enter a system permissive of MAiD, and may help to ensure equitable access to care. This study assessed medical student views on MAiD, factors influencing these views, and opportunities for medical education.

methodsAn exploratory cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed to medical students across all years of a three-year Canadian undergraduate medical program. The investigators administered the survey to participants during academic sessions from November to December, 2015. Analysis of the results included summary descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square test of independence to identify differences between participants by year of study, logistic regression to identify factors that influence students' stances on MAiD, and Wilcoxon signed rank test to measure changes in student support for MAiD and comfort discussing MAiD.

resultsThere were 405 participants for a response rate of 87%. The majority of students (88%) supported the Supreme Court's decision, 61% would provide the means for a patient to end their life, and 38% would personally administer a lethal medication. Students who were more willing to provide the means for MAiD found medical education/clinical experience and patient autonomy to be important contributors to their stances on MAiD. Those students who were less willing to provide the means for MAiD found religious/spiritual beliefs and teachings, as well as concern about potential negative consequences, to be important contributors to their stances on MAiD. Educational training desired by participants included medicolegal (91%), communication skills (80%), technical skills (75%), and religious (49%).

conclusionsMedical students generally supported and would provide the means for MAiD to patients. They also indicated a desire for directed medical education on MAiD.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateMoralsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCanadaClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePersonal AutonomyReview Literature as TopicSpiritualityStudents, MedicalSuicide, AssistedTerminally IllAssisted suicideAttitudes and opinionsEnd-of-lifeEuthanasiaMedical assistance in dyingMedical educationMedical students

Identifiers

PMID29078769
PMCPMC5658957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.