Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29078644›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2017

Technical considerations for the fully robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Daniel Galvez, Rebecca Sorber, Ammar A Javed, Jin He

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Initiation of a robotic pancreatoduodenectomy program using virtual collaboration.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Propensity-Matched Analysis to Open and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the era of minimally invasive surgery.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020
    Review
  11. Open and Minimal Approaches to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel GalvezDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Rebecca SorberDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Ammar A JavedDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Jin HeDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Johns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, has become the standard of care for many abdominal procedures. However, the technical complexity associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) due to the anatomic location and oncologic characteristics of pancreatic tumors has hindered the widespread application of minimally invasive techniques to this procedure. Recent studies have reported that for experienced surgeons, the application of robotic techniques to PD is associated with equivalent oncologic outcomes and rates of complication when compared to an open operation, and may be associated with accelerated surgical recovery. Despite these encouraging results, robotic PD (RPD) is a procedure attempted by a small group of pancreatic surgeons, leading to the great heterogeneity in the techniques used to perform this operation. Herein we describe our technique for fully RPD and demonstrate its execution with a video supplement.

Indexed as

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)robotic surgeryWhipple procedure

Identifiers

PMID29078644
PMCPMC5638600
OpenAlexW2625791799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.