Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29078604›Full record

ReviewJournal of visualized surgery2017

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery bronchial sleeve lobectomy.

Fabio Davoli, Luca Bertolaccini, Alessandro Pardolesi, Piergiorgio Solli

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of visualized surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabio DavoliThoracic Surgery, AUSL Romagna, S. Maria delle Croci Teaching Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Luca BertolacciniThoracic Surgery, AUSL Romagna, S. Maria delle Croci Teaching Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Alessandro PardolesiThoracic Surgery, AUSL Romagna, Morgagni-Pierantoni Teaching Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Piergiorgio SolliThoracic Surgery, AUSL Romagna, S. Maria delle Croci Teaching Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Ospedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sleeve lobectomy (SL) is considered a valid option instead of a pneumonectomy in patients affected by central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the last few years, the improvement of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has allowed experienced surgeons to carry out this challenging operation by a minimally invasive approach. A full pre-operative assessment enclosing a flexible fiber-optic bronchoscopy evaluation and a multidisciplinary team discussion of the clinical case must be accomplished. There is no strictly an indication for the number of thoracoscopic ports: VATS SL is reported from 1 to 3-4 incisions. A significant variability in the technique of the anastomosis is documented and depends on the personal use and ability of the surgeon. However the operational principles are the same of an open SL: free bronchial margins at the frozen section examination, tension-free anastomosis, avoid luminal disparity and en-bloc resection. Due to the extent of the tumour, VATS SL can be associated to other complex resections like arterioplasty, or double sleeve (bronchial and artery) mainly on the left side. A patient underwent a VATS SL must be enrolled in an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP): physiological rehabilitation is a key point to achieve good outcomes and avoid complications.

Indexed as

Non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC)sleeve lobectomy (SL)video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID29078604
PMCPMC5637985
OpenAlexW2597852448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.