Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29078204›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2018

Contact-dependent interbacterial toxins deliver a message.

Erin C Garcia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Potential ProbioticMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition in Bacteria: Do Not Get Too Close!International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Capsule ProtectsFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Properties of an Antimicrobial Molecule Produced by anAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin C GarciaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, United States. Electronic address: erin.garcia@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Contact-Dependent Interbacterial Signaling in BurkholderiaK22AI118949 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GARCIA, ERIN C · 2016 to 2017
$270k
NIAID NIH HHS K22 AI118949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms harbor systems for delivering toxins to neighboring bacteria upon direct cell contact. These systems, typified by type VI secretion (T6S) and contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems, are defined by their ability to mediate interbacterial competition in vitro, while their biological roles have remained uncertain. Recent research into the mechanisms of toxin delivery and activity, as well as investigation of contact-dependent toxin function during relevant biological processes, has offered insight into how interbacterial competition might work outside of the laboratory. Furthermore, non-competitive roles for contact-dependent toxin delivery systems, including interbacterial signal transduction, have been described. This review suggests that contact-dependent toxin delivery systems that exhibit functions beyond interbacterial competition are probably more common than currently appreciated.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsBiofilmsBurkholderiaMicrobial InteractionsSignal TransductionType VI Secretion SystemsBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsType VI Secretion Systems

Identifiers

PMID29078204
PMCPMC5899628
OpenAlexW2765149487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.