Trial reportCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2017
The asymmetrical effect of leftward and rightward prisms on intact visuospatial cognition.
Trial report in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of prism adaptation and virtual-tilted environment on straight-ahead and verticality perception in healthy individuals: evidence for dissociated 2D spatial coordinate systems.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Increasing affective distance - leftward prism adaptation amplifies alexithymia in healthy females.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Modulation of memory by prism adaptation in healthy subjects.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dynamic changes in spatial representation within the posterior parietal cortex in response to visuomotor adaptation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Editorial: Uncovering the neural correlates of prism adaptation: Evidence from the brain network approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Visuomanual Vertical Prism Adaptation: Aftereffects on Visuospatial and Auditory Frequency Representations.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Choosing Sides: Impact of Prismatic Adaptation on the Lateralization of the Attentional System.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Does hand modulate the reshaping of the attentional system during rightward prism adaptation? An fMRI study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Effective connectivity underlying neural and behavioral components of prism adaptation.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Improvement of phonemic fluency following leftward prism adaptation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Callosal anisotropy predicts attentional network changes after parietal inhibitory stimulation.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Opposing force fields induce direction-specific sensorimotor adaptation but a non-specific perceptual shift consistent with a contraction of peripersonal space representation.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- How Does Attention Alter Length Perception? A Prism Adaptation Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Left-shifting prism adaptation boosts reward-based learning.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018Article
- Towards a neuro-computational account of prism adaptation.Neuropsychologia · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rightward prismatic adaptation (RPA) can reduce neglect symptoms in patients whereas adaptation to leftward deviating prisms (LPA) can induce neglect-like behavior in healthy subjects. One influential anatomo-functional model of prismatic adaptation (PA) postulates that it inhibits activity of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) contralateral to the prismatic deviation. By hypo-activating the PPC and thus eventually acting on interhemispheric balance, both LPA and RPA could possibly affect visuospatial perception in healthy subjects, however, such behavioral modulation has seldom been reported after RPA. In the light of recent evidence showing that LPA-induced visuospatial shift need time to develop we hypothesized that RPA might induce significant changes in visuospatial cognition on a longer time scale. We thus assessed the Landmark task, as well as sensorimotor aftereffects, several times over 8 h after a single session of either LPA or RPA. In agreement with previous reports, sensorimotor effects were symmetrical and long-lasting, with both LPA and RPA inducing shifts of comparable amplitudes in the direction opposite to the deviation that lasted up to 8 h. Visuospatial cognition assessed by Landmark performance, was also significantly modulated for up to 8 h, but only after LPA. Interestingly, the timing and direction of this modulation differed according to participants' baseline bias. An initial leftward bias led to a rapid, but short-lasting rightward shift, whereas an initial rightward bias led to a slower-developing and longer-lasting leftward shift. These findings shed new light on a so-far relatively overlooked feature of spatial cognition that may interact with the effect of PA: the state of the visuospatial system prior to PA should be taken into account when attempting to understand and modulate visuospatial cognition in healthy and brain-damaged populations. This highlights the need for refining current models of PA's mechanisms of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.