Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29077900›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2018

Patient acceptable symptom state in scleroderma: results from the tocilizumab compared with placebo trial in active diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

Michael B Arnold, Dinesh Khanna, Christopher P Denton, Jacob M van Laar, Tracy M Frech, Marina E Anderson, Murray Baron, Lorinda Chung, Gerhard Fierlbeck, Santhanam Lakshminarayanan and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 6 countries.

Michael B ArnoldSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Dinesh KhannaRheumatology, University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christopher P DentonRheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, University College London Medical School, London, UK.
Jacob M van LaarRheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tracy M FrechRheumatology, University of Utah, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Marina E AndersonRheumatology, University of Liverpool and Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Murray BaronRheumatology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lorinda ChungMedicine and Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine and Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Gerhard FierlbeckDermatology, University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany.
Santhanam LakshminarayananRheumatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Yannick AllanoreRheumatology, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Gabriela RiemekastenRheumatology, Charité University Hospital, German Rheumatism Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
Virginia SteenRheumatology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Ulf Müller-LadnerLehrstuhl für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Kerckhoff Clinic, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Helen SpotswoodRoche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Laura BurkeRoche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Jeffrey SiegelRheumatology and Rare Diseases, Genentech, South San Francisco.
Angelika JahreisRheumatology and Rare Diseases, Genentech, South San Francisco.
Daniel E FurstRheumatology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Janet E PopeSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Roche (United Kingdom) · GBWestern University · CACharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGeorgetown University · USJewish General Hospital · CAKerckhoff Klinik · DEUConn Health · USUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Utah · USUtrecht University · NLVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) as an absolute state of well-being has shown promise as an outcome measure in many rheumatologic conditions. We aimed to assess whether PASS may be effective in active diffuse cutaneous SSc differentiating active from placebo. Methods: Data from the phase 2 Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Tocilizumab in Adults with Systemic Sclerosis (faSScinate) trial were used, which compared tocilizumab (TCZ) vs placebo over 48 weeks followed by an open-label TCZ period to 96 weeks. Three different types of PASS questions were evaluated at weeks 8, 24, 48 and 96, including if a current state would be acceptable over time as a yes vs no response and Likert scales about how acceptable a current state is if remaining over time. Additional outcomes assessed included modified Rodnan skin score, HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI), physician and patient global assessments on a visual analogue scale, CRP and ESR. Results: The placebo group consisted of 44 patients and the TCZ group had 43 patients. At baseline, 33% achieved a PASS for all three PASS questions, with the proportion increasing to 69, 71 and 78%, respectively, at 96 weeks. Changes in PASS scores showed a moderately negative correlation with HAQ-DI and patient and physician global assessments visual analogue scales, which indicates expected improvements as PASS improved. The PASS question, 'Considering all of the ways your scleroderma has affected you, how acceptable would you rate your level of symptoms?' showed significant correlations with patient-reported outcomes and differentiating placebo vs TCZ at 48 weeks (P = 0.023). Conclusion: PASS may be used as a patient-centred outcome in SSc, especially as a 7-point Likert scale. Further validation is required to determine the utility as an outcome measure in trials and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedScleroderma, DiffuseTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic Agentstocilizumabdiffuse systemic sclerosisoutcome measurePASSpatient acceptable symptom statepatient-reported outcomessclerodermasystemic sclerosistocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID29077900
PMCPMC5850780
OpenAlexW2765091613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.