Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29077731›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Healthy competition drives success in results-based aid: Lessons from the Salud Mesoamérica Initiative.

Charbel El Bcheraoui, Erin B Palmisano, Emily Dansereau, Alexandra Schaefer, Alexander Woldeab, Maziar Moradi-Lakeh, Benito Salvatierra, Bernardo Hernandez-Prado, Ali H Mokdad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Equity Tool for Valuing Global Health Partnerships.Global health, science and practice · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing multidimensional care coverage for pre-eclampsia in the era of universal health coverage: A pre-post evaluation of the Salud Mesoamérica Initiative.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charbel El BcheraouiInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3117-9966
Erin B PalmisanoInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Emily DansereauInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Alexandra SchaeferInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Alexander WoldeabInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Maziar Moradi-LakehInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Benito SalvatierraEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Barrio Maria Auxiliadora, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, MÉXICO.
Bernardo Hernandez-PradoInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Ali H MokdadInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Salud Mesoamérica Initiative (SMI) is a three-operation strategy, and is a pioneer in the world of results-based aid (RBA) in terms of the success it has achieved in improving health system inputs following its initial operation. This success in meeting pre-defined targets is rare in the world of financial assistance for health. We investigated the influential aspects of SMI that could have contributed to its effectiveness in improving health systems, with the aim of providing international donors, bilateral organizations, philanthropies, and recipient countries with new perspectives that can help increase the effectiveness of future assistance for health, specifically in the arena of RBA.

methodsQualitative methods based on the criteria of relevance and effectiveness proposed by the Development Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Our methods included document review, key informant interviews, a focus group discussion, and a partnership analysis.

participantsA purposive sample of 113 key informants, comprising donors, representatives from the Inter-American Development Bank, ministries of health, technical assistance organizations, evaluation organizations, and health care providers.

resultsDuring May-October 2016, we interviewed regarding the relevance and effectiveness of SMI. Themes emerged relative to the topics we investigated, and covered the design and the drivers of success of the initiative. The success is due to 1) the initiative's regional approach, which pressured recipient countries to compete toward meeting targets, 2) a robust and flexible design that incorporated the richness of input from stakeholders at all levels, 3) the design-embedded evaluation component that created a culture of accountability among recipient countries, and 4) the reflective knowledge environment that created a culture of evidence-based decision-making.

conclusionsA regional approach involving all appropriate stakeholders, and based on knowledge sharing and embedded evaluation can help ensure the effectiveness of future results-based aid programs for health in global settings.

Indexed as

Competitive BehaviorFocus GroupsHumansLatin America

Identifiers

PMID29077731
PMCPMC5659784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.