Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29077690›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2017

Small-cell lung cancer: what we know, what we need to know and the path forward.

Adi F Gazdar, Paul A Bunn, John D Minna

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 491 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
491citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
32.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

491 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 906 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

431 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adi F GazdarHamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75230-8593, USA.
Paul A BunnDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.
John D MinnaHamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75230-8593, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS--SPORE IN LUNG CANCERP50CA070907 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEYMACH, JOHN V., MINNA, JOHN D. · 1996 to 2024
$57.4M
Tissue Bank and Biomarkers CoreP50CA058187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI NEMENOFF, RAPHAEL A. · 1992 to 2018
$43.8M
Coordinating center for the NCI small cell lung cancer research consortiumU24CA213274 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Lauren Averett Byers, JOHN D. MINNA · 2017 to 2026
$12.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058187NCI NIH HHS P50 CA070907NCI NIH HHS U24 CA213274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a deadly tumour accounting for approximately 15% of lung cancers and is pathologically, molecularly, biologically and clinically very different from other lung cancers. While the majority of tumours express a neuroendocrine programme (integrating neural and endocrine properties), an important subset of tumours have low or absent expression of this programme. The probable initiating molecular events are inactivation of TP53 and RB1, as well as frequent disruption of several signalling networks, including Notch signalling. SCLC, when diagnosed, is usually widely metastatic and initially responds to cytotoxic therapy but nearly always rapidly relapses with resistance to further therapies. There were no important therapeutic clinical advances for 30 years, leading SCLC to be designated a 'recalcitrant cancer'. Scientific studies are hampered by a lack of tissue availability. However, over the past 5 years, there has been a worldwide resurgence of studies on SCLC, including comprehensive molecular analyses, the development of relevant genetically engineered mouse models and the establishment of patient-derived xenografts. These studies have led to the discovery of new potential therapeutic vulnerabilities for SCLC and therefore to new clinical trials. Thus, while the past has been bleak, the future offers greater promise.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsHumansMiceNeurosecretory SystemsReceptors, NotchRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsSignal TransductionSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ubiquitin-Protein LigasesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysRB1 protein, humanReceptors, NotchRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID29077690
OpenAlexW2765782352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.