Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29077531›Full record

ArticleClinical gerontologist

Conceptual and Empirical Approaches to Financial Decision-making by Older Adults: Results from a Financial Decision-making Rating Scale.

Peter A Lichtenberg, Katja Ocepek-Welikson, Lisa J Ficker, Evan Gross, Analise Rahman-Filipiak, Jeanne A Teresi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gerontologist. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Scammers' Psychological Warfare: A Call to Arms.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Impact of Financial Coaching on Older Adult Victims of Financial Exploitation: A Quasi-Experimental Research Study.Financial counseling and planning : the journal of the Association for Financial Counseling and Planning Education · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter A Lichtenberga Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University , Detroit , Michigan , USA.
Katja Ocepek-Weliksonc Research Division , Hebrew Home at Riverdale; RiverSpring Health, New York , New York , USA.
Lisa J Fickera Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University , Detroit , Michigan , USA.
Evan Grossa Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University , Detroit , Michigan , USA.
Analise Rahman-Filipiake Neuropsychology Section , University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA.
Jeanne A Teresic Research Division , Hebrew Home at Riverdale; RiverSpring Health, New York , New York , USA.

Funding

Michigan Center for Urban African American Aging Research - RESEARCH CORE (REC)P30AG015281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Briana Mezuk · 1997 to 2026
$19.3M
Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG053760 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALBIN, ROGER L · 2016 to 2020
$10.1M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES020957 · NIEHS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RUDEN, DOUGLAS M · 2014 to 2021
$10.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG015281NIA NIH HHS P30 AG053760NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES020957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of this study were threefold: (1) to empirically test the conceptual model proposed by the Lichtenberg Financial Decision-making Rating Scale (LFDRS); (2) to examine the psychometric properties of the LFDRS contextual factors in financial decision-making by investigating both the reliability and convergent validity of the subscales and total scale, and (3) extending previous work on the scale through the collection of normative data on financial decision-making.

methodsA convenience sample of 200 independent function and community dwelling older adults underwent cognitive and financial management testing and were interviewed using the LFDRS. Confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency measures, and hierarchical regression were used in a sample of 200 community-dwelling older adults, all of whom were making or had recently made a significant financial decision.

resultsResults confirmed the scale's reliability and supported the conceptual model. Convergent validity analyses indicate that as hypothesized, cognition is a significant predictor of risk scores. Financial management scores, however, were not predictive of decision-making risk scores.

conclusionsThe psychometric properties of the LFDRS support the scale's use as it was proposed. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The LFDRS instructions and scale are provided for clinicians to use in financial capacity assessments.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFinancial ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overEmpirical ResearchFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedNeurocognitive DisordersPsychometricsCognitive impairmentfinancial capacityfinancial decision-making

Identifiers

PMID29077531
PMCPMC5766370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.