Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29076887›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular pharmacology2018

Use of Levosimendan in Cardiac Surgery: An Update After the LEVO-CTS, CHEETAH, and LICORN Trials in the Light of Clinical Practice.

Fabio Guarracino, Matthias Heringlake, Bernard Cholley, Dominique Bettex, Stefaan Bouchez, Vladimir V Lomivorotov, Angela Rajek, Matti Kivikko, Piero Pollesello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Pro: Levosimendan in Cardiac Surgery].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024
    Article
  6. [Cons: Levosimendan for cardiac surgery].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabio GuarracinoDipartimento di Anestesia e Terapie Intensive, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Matthias HeringlakeKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Bernard CholleyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Dominique BettexCardiac Anaesthesia, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefaan BouchezDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Vladimir V LomivorotovDepartment of Anesthesiology, E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Angela RajekKlinische Abteilung für Herz-Thorax-Gefäßchirurgische Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matti KivikkoCritical Care Proprietary Products, Orion Pharma, Espoo, Finland.
Piero PolleselloCritical Care Proprietary Products, Orion Pharma, Espoo, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer and adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channel opener, which exerts sustained hemodynamic, symptomatic, and organ-protective effects. It is registered for the treatment of acute heart failure, and when inotropic support is considered appropriate. In the past 15 years, levosimendan has been widely used in clinical practice and has also been tested in clinical trials to stabilize at-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Recently, 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies (LICORN, CHEETAH, and LEVO-CTS) have been published reporting on the perioperative use of levosimendan in patients with compromised cardiac ventricular function. Taken together, many smaller trials conducted in the past suggested beneficial outcomes with levosimendan in perioperative settings. By contrast, the latest 3 studies were neutral or inconclusive. To understand the reasons for such dissimilarity, a group of experts from Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and Russia, including investigators from the 3 most recent studies, met to discuss the study results in the light of both the previous literature and current clinical practice. Despite the fact that the null hypothesis could not be ruled out in the recent multicenter trials, we conclude that levosimendan can still be viewed as a safe and effective inodilator in cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiovascular AgentsClinical Decision-MakingCongresses as TopicConsensusEvidence-Based MedicineHeart DiseasesHumansPatient SelectionPerioperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsSimendanTreatment OutcomeCardiovascular AgentsSimendan

Identifiers

PMID29076887
PMCPMC5768218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.