Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29076880›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2018

Early steps toward understanding neuronal communication.

Adam C Snyder, Matthew A Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam C SnyderDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University.
Matthew A SmithDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Institute.

Funding

Virus Production and Manipulation of Protein/Gene Expression ModuleP30EY008098 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Marlene Behrmann · 1989 to 2026
$17.8M
Slow time scale fluctuations in neurons and behaviorR01MH128393 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW A SMITH · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
Dynamic Mechanisms of active vision in prefrontal cortexR01EY022928 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SMITH, MATTHEW A · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
CRCNS: Interhemispheric coordination for memory and actionR01NS147766 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI Joseph Patrick Mayo, MATTHEW A SMITH · 2025 to 2026
$750k
High-dimensional analysis of selective visual attention mechanismsR00EY025768 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SNYDER, ADAM CHRISTOPHER · 2018 to 2020
$744k
Identifying selective visual attention mechanisms through high-dimensional analysis.K99EY025768 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, ADAM CHRISTOPHER · 2015 to 2016
$196k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY025768NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008098NEI NIH HHS R00 EY025768NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022928NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128393NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS147766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe computational power of the brain arises from the complex interactions between neurons. One straightforward method to quantify the strength of neuronal interactions is by measuring correlation and coherence. Efforts to measure correlation have been advancing rapidly of late, spurred by the development of advanced recording technologies enabling recording from many neurons and brain areas simultaneously. This review highlights recent results that provide clues into the principles of neural coordination, connections to cognitive and neurological phenomena, and key directions for future research. RECENT

findingsThe correlation structure of neural activity in the brain has important consequences for the encoding properties of neural populations. Recent studies have shown that this correlation structure is not fixed, but adapts in a variety of contexts in ways that appear beneficial to task performance. By studying these changes in biological neural networks and computational models, researchers have improved our understanding of the principles guiding neural communication. SUMMARY: Correlation and coherence are highly informative metrics for studying coding and communication in the brain. Recent findings have emphasized how the brain modifies correlation structure dynamically in order to improve information-processing in a goal-directed fashion. One key direction for future research concerns how to leverage these dynamic changes for therapeutic purposes.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainHumansNerve NetNeurons

Identifiers

PMID29076880
PMCPMC6767631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.