Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29076878›Full record

Trial reportEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2018

Composition or Context: Using Transportability to Understand Drivers of Site Differences in a Large-scale Housing Experiment.

Kara E Rudolph, Nicole M Schmidt, M Maria Glymour, Rebecca Crowder, Jessica Galin, Jennifer Ahern, Theresa L Osypuk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Causal Inference Methods for Combining Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: A Review.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kara E Rudolph
Nicole M Schmidt
M Maria Glymour
Rebecca Crowder
Jessica Galin
Jennifer Ahern
Theresa L Osypuk
Berkeley Public Health Division · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USMinnesota Department of Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Effects of a housing policy experiment on youth behavioral problemsR01MD006064 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OSYPUK, THERESA LOUISE · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
Mechanisms Underlying Differential Effects of Neighborhood Poverty on Problematic Adolescent Drug UseK99DA042127 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RUDOLPH, KARA ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2017
$309k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA042127NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD006064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Moving To Opportunity (MTO) experiment manipulated neighborhood context by randomly assigning housing vouchers to volunteers living in public housing to use to move to lower poverty neighborhoods in five US cities. This random assignment overcomes confounding limitations that challenge other neighborhood studies. However, differences in MTO's effects across the five cities have been largely ignored. Such differences could be due to population composition (e.g., differences in the racial/ethnic distribution) or to context (e.g., differences in the economy).

methodsUsing a nonparametric omnibus test and a multiply robust, semiparametric estimator for transportability, we assessed the extent to which differences in individual-level compositional characteristics that may act as effect modifiers can account for differences in MTO's effects across sites. We examined MTO's effects on marijuana use, behavioral problems, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder among black and Latino adolescent males, where housing voucher receipt was harmful for health in some sites but beneficial in others.

resultsComparing point estimates, differences in composition partially explained site differences in MTO effects on marijuana use and behavioral problems but did not explain site differences for major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder.

conclusionsOur findings provide quantitative, rigorous evidence for the importance of context or unmeasured individual-level compositional variables in modifying MTO's effects.

Indexed as

PovertyPublic HousingSocial MobilityAdolescentCitiesHealth BehaviorHumansMaleResidence CharacteristicsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29076878
PMCPMC5792307
OpenAlexW2765735690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.