Observational studyThe British journal of radiology2018
Predicting poor outcome from simple ankle injuries: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Recovery in Active-Duty Military Personnel Following a Novel, Self-applicable, Stepwise, Target-Oriented Protocol for Lateral Ankle Sprain: A Prospective Cohort Study.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2025Article
- Injury severity at the time of sport-related ankle sprain is associated with symptoms and quality of life in young adults after 3-15 years.Annals of medicine · 2023Article
- Extremity CT and ultrasound in the assessment of ankle injuries: occult fractures and ligament injuries.The British journal of radiology · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSprained ankles are common and when there are no signs or evidence of a fracture, conventional management is conservative. At present, there are no clinical markers to identify those that may develop persisting instability and disability that would require rehabilitation or surgery.
objectivesTo investigate the nature and extent of soft tissue ankle injuries, and to consider whether the anatomical severity of injury can predict functional outcome.
methodsPatients attending a local Accident and Emergency Department in Oxford with an acute ankle injury with no clinical requirement for radiographs, or where radiographs were normal, were invited into the study. Within 5 days, patients underwent a diagnostic ultrasound examination, a cone beam CT study and a disability assessment. Ultrasound and physiotherapy assessments were repeated at 3 and 6 months.
results100 patients were recruited and grouped based upon injuries. 58 had simple ankle injuries, 21 complex, 19 had significant fractures and 2 were excluded from further follow up analysis. There were no clinically significant differences in pain, disability or functional outcomes between the groups at all points of the study.
conclusionMedium to long term clinical outcomes were not solely determined by the severity of injury. Some patients with simple injuries were seen to have ongoing problems, whereas some with complex injuries recovered completely in a shorter period. Advances in knowledge: The severity of an ankle injury determined by radiological imaging does not necessarily dictate the severity of a patient's symptoms and the trajectory of their recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.