Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29076743›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Depiction of lower limb venous anatomy in patients undergoing interventional deep venous reconstruction-the role of balanced steady state free precession MRI.

Vincent G Helyar, Yuri Gupta, Lyndall Blakeway, Geoff Charles-Edwards, Konstantinos Katsanos, Narayan Karunanithy

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Acute and Chronic Ilio-Femoral Venous Reconstruction.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Inferior and Superior Vena Cava Reconstruction.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent G Helyar1 Department of Radiology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Basingstoke , UK.
Yuri Gupta2 Department of Radiology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Lyndall Blakeway4 Department of Medical Physics, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Geoff Charles-Edwards4 Department of Medical Physics, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Konstantinos Katsanos5 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras , Patras , Greece.
Narayan Karunanithy2 Department of Radiology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBGeneral University Hospital of Patras · GRHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluates the use of balanced steady-state free precession MRI (bSSFP-MRI) in the diagnostic work-up of patients undergoing interventional deep venous reconstruction (I-DVR). Intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) was used as the gold-standard for comparison to assess disease extent and severity.

methodsA retrospective comparison of bSSFP-MRI to IVDSA was performed in all patients undergoing both examinations for treatment planning prior to I-DVR. The severity of disease in each venous segment was graded by two board-certified radiologists working independently, according to a predetermined classification system.

resultsIn total, 44 patients (225 venous segments) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 156 abnormal venous segments were diagnosed using bSSFP-MRI compared with 151 using IVDSA. The prevalence of disease was higher in the iliac and femoral segments (range, 79.6-88.6%). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and the diagnostic ratio for bSSFP-MRI were 99.3%, 91.9%, 12.3, 0.007 and 1700, respectively.

conclusionThis study supports the use of non-contrast balanced SSFP-MRI in the assessment of the deep veins of the lower limb prior to I-DVR. The technique offers an accurate, fast and non-invasive alternative to IVDSA. Advances in Knowledge: Although balanced SSFP-MRI is commonly used in cardiac imaging, its use elsewhere is limited and its use in evaluating the deep veins prior to interventional reconstruction is not described. Our study demonstrates the usefulness of this technique in the work-up of patients awaiting interventional venous reconstruction compared with the current gold standard.

Indexed as

Angiography, Digital SubtractionMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansIohexolLikelihood FunctionsLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPostthrombotic SyndromeRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaiodixanolIohexolTriiodobenzoic Acids

Identifiers

PMID29076743
PMCPMC5965789
OpenAlexW2766914419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.