ReviewNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2017
Thinking Small: Progress on Microscale Neurostimulation Technology.
Review in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Complications of epidural spinal stimulation: lessons from the past and alternatives for the future.Spinal cord · 2020Pooled it
- MRI-compatible soft fiber bioelectronics for multimodal assessment of electrical neural stimulation on whole-brain activation.National science review · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: Integrated High-Density Microelectrode Arrays for Cellular, Organoid, and Clinical Electrophysiology.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Silicon Carbide Neural Interfaces: A Review of Progress Toward Monolithic Devices.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Softening, Conformable, and Stretchable Conductors for Implantable Bioelectronics Interfaces.Advanced materials technologies · 2025Article
- Towards Precise Synthetic Neural Codes: High-dimensional Stimulation with Flexible Electrodes.Npj flexible electronics · 2025Article
- Enhancing biocompatibility of the brain-machine interface: A review.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Corrigendum to "Platelets and Hemostatic Proteins are Co-Localized with Chronic Neuroinflammation Surrounding Implanted Intracortical Microelectrodes" [Acta Biomaterialia. Volume 166, August 2023, Pages 278-290].Acta biomaterialia · 2024Article
- Article
- MnOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Platelets and hemostatic proteins are co-localized with chronic neuroinflammation surrounding implanted intracortical microelectrodes.Acta biomaterialia · 2023Article
- Low-threshold, high-resolution, chronically stable intracortical microstimulation by ultraflexible electrodes.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Behavioral Paradigm for the Evaluation of Stimulation-Evoked Somatosensory Perception Thresholds in Rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Low-threshold, high-resolution, chronically stable intracortical microstimulation by ultraflexible electrodes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Behavioral paradigm for the evaluation of stimulation-evoked somatosensory perception thresholds in rats.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- A Novel 3D Helical Microelectrode Array for In Vitro Extracellular Action Potential Recording.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Recording of pig neuronal activity in the comparative context of the awake human brain.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effects of central nervous system electrical stimulation on non-neuronal cells.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Visual percepts evoked with an intracortical 96-channel microelectrode array inserted in human occipital cortex.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Article
- 3D fuzzy graphene microelectrode array for dopamine sensing at sub-cellular spatial resolution.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesNeural stimulation is well-accepted as an effective therapy for a wide range of neurological disorders. While the scale of clinical devices is relatively large, translational, and pilot clinical applications are underway for microelectrode-based systems. Microelectrodes have the advantage of stimulating a relatively small tissue volume which may improve selectivity of therapeutic stimuli. Current microelectrode technology is associated with chronic tissue response which limits utility of these devices for neural recording and stimulation. One approach for addressing the tissue response problem may be to reduce physical dimensions of the device. "Thinking small" is a trend for the electronics industry, and for implantable neural interfaces, the result may be a device that can evade the foreign body response. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review paper surveys our current understanding pertaining to the relationship between implant size and tissue response and the state-of-the-art in ultrasmall microelectrodes. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), and Google Scholar.
resultsThe literature review shows recent efforts to create microelectrodes that are extremely thin appear to reduce or even eliminate the chronic tissue response. With high charge capacity coatings, ultramicroelectrodes fabricated from emerging polymers, and amorphous silicon carbide appear promising for neurostimulation applications.
conclusionWe envision the emergence of robust and manufacturable ultramicroelectrodes that leverage advanced materials where the small cross-sectional geometry enables compliance within tissue. Nevertheless, future testing under in vivo conditions is particularly important for assessing the stability of thin film devices under chronic stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.