Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075967›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.

Shinsuke Kanekiyo, Shigeru Takeda, Masahito Tsutsui, Mitsuo Nishiyama, Masahiro Kitahara, Yoshitaro Shindo, Yukio Tokumitsu, Shinobu Tomochika, Yoshihiro Tokuhisa, Michihisa Iida and 7 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shinsuke KanekiyoDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan. sin018@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-9506-8694
Shigeru TakedaDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Masahito TsutsuiDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Mitsuo NishiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Masahiro KitaharaDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Yoshitaro ShindoDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Yukio TokumitsuDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Shinobu TomochikaDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Yoshihiro TokuhisaDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Michihisa IidaDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Kazuhiko SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Nobuaki SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Shigeru YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Shigefumi YoshinoOncology Center, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Japan.
Shoichi HazamaDepartment of Translational Research and Developmental Therapeutics against Cancer, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Tomio UenoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Hiroaki NaganoDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Yamaguchi University · JPKawasaki Medical School · JPYamaguchi University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, cytokine levels, outcome, and survival rates after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were retrospectively investigated in a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between the thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) in the prone position and open esophagectomy (OE). PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween 2005 and 2014, TE was performed on a group of 85 patients, which was compared with a group of 104 OE cases. Eventually, 65 paired cases were matched using propensity score matching.

resultsAlthough the TE group underwent a significantly longer operation time than the OE group (P < 0.001), the TE group exhibited less blood loss (P < 0.001) and had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.038) than the OE group. The serum interleukin-6 levels on ICU admission (P < 0.001) and on POD 1 (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the TE group. The interleukin-10 levels on ICU admission (P < 0.001), POD 1 (P = 0.016), and POD 3 (P < 0.001) were also significantly lower in the TE group. Pulmonary complication was significantly lower in the TE group (P = 0.043). The 5-year PFS rates in the TE and OE groups were 70.6 and 58.7% (P = 0.328), respectively, and OS rates were 64.9 and 50.2% (P = 0.101), respectively.

conclusionTE compared to OE is a less invasive procedure with lower surgical stress and less pulmonary complication for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAgedEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagectomyFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePatient PositioningPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateCytokinesEsophageal cancerMinimally invasive surgeryProne positionSurgical stress

Identifiers

PMID29075967
OpenAlexW2766924885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.