Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075914›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2018

Sonographic assessment of subacromial bursa distension during arm abduction: establishing a threshold value in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome.

Gokhan Soker, Bozkurt Gulek, Eda Soker, Omer Kaya, Ibrahim Inan, Muhammet Arslan, Kaan Esen, Derya Memis, Cengiz Yilmaz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04290468 (Role of Ultrasound in Shoulder Impingement), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04290468 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Role of Ultrasound in Shoulder Impingement

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled37ConditionsShoulder ImpingementArmsDynamic ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gokhan SokerDepartment of Radiology, SBU Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ege Bagatur Bulvarı Serinevler Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey. gsoker@hotmail.com.
Bozkurt GulekDepartment of Radiology, SBU Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ege Bagatur Bulvarı Serinevler Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey.
Eda SokerDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, SBU Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.
Omer KayaDepartment of Radiology, SBU Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ege Bagatur Bulvarı Serinevler Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey.
Ibrahim InanDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Turkey.
Muhammet ArslanDepartment of Radiology, SBU Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ege Bagatur Bulvarı Serinevler Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey.
Kaan EsenDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
Derya MemisDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, SBU Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.
Cengiz YilmazDepartment of Radiology, SBU Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ege Bagatur Bulvarı Serinevler Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey.
Adana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRAdıyaman University · TRMersin Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we aimed to establish a quantitative threshold value in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome by measuring the thickness of the subacromial bursa during abduction and adduction. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-five patients with subacromial impingement syndrome and 54 healthy individuals underwent dynamic shoulder ultrasonography. The subacromial bursa, between the supraspinatus tendon margin and peribursal adipose tissue, was measured between the acromion and humeral head at its widest part. The subacromial impingement ratio was calculated by dividing the subacromial bursa thickness during abduction to the subacromial bursa thickness during adduction. Shapiro-Wilk test was used in the assessment of normal distribution of parameters.

resultsThe mean subacromial bursa thickness in the abduction position was 1.8 ± 1.1 mm in the study group and 0.9 ± 0.3 mm in the control group. The mean subacromial bursa thickness in the adduction position was 0.9 ± 0.5 mm in the study group and 0.8 ± 0.3 mm in the control group. The subacromial impingement ratio showed a statistically significant difference between groups (p < 0.0001), and the ratio being 2.0 ± 0.5 in the study group and 1.2 ± 0.1 in the control group. For measurements performed in the abduction position, the best cut-off value was calculated as 1.3 mm, and sensitivity and specificity were 70.6 and 85.2%, respectively. The best cut-off value was 1.4 for the subacromial impingement ratio, and sensitivity and specificity were 88.2 and 96.3%, respectively.

conclusionSubacromial impingement ratio is a very practical and reliable method in subacromial impingement syndrome diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBursa, SynovialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularReference ValuesShoulder Impingement SyndromeUltrasonographyDynamic shoulder ultrasonographySubacromial bursaSubacromial impingement syndrome

Identifiers

PMID29075914
OpenAlexW2765856606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.