Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075907›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2018

[Psychocardiology in inpatient rehabilitation].

Rita Fuchs-Strizek, Thomas Berger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rita Fuchs-StrizekSonderkrankenanstalt Rehabilitationszentrum Saalfelden, Thorerstraße 26, 5760, Saalfelden, Österreich. office@fuchs-strizek.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-0114
Thomas BergerSonderkrankenanstalt Rehabilitationszentrum Saalfelden, Thorerstraße 26, 5760, Saalfelden, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychosocial risk factors contribute to the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases. They are associated with an unhealthy lifestyle, low patient adherence, alterations in autonomic function and endocrine markers. Thus, in cardiac rehabilitation, psychosocial risk factors should be assessed besides somatic factors. Patients with clinically significant symptoms ought to be referred for further psychological diagnostics. Depending on the findings, patients should be offered psychological interventions like relaxation training, stress management courses, smoking cessation programmes and individual counselling. Individual counselling includes psychoeducation, focused interventions and building motivation for further treatment. With regard to evidence-based interventions, motivating communication as well as behaviour and coping planning deserves particular notice. In terms of clinical efficacy, psychological interventions are evaluated and partially effective on cardiac prognosis. Hence, the significance of psychocardiology in inpatient rehabilitation should be enhanced.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCardiovascular DiseasesRisk Reduction BehaviorHumansInpatientsPsychotherapyRisk FactorsPsychosocial risk factorsScreening and treatment of psychocardiological

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.