Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075839›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2018

Occult spinal dysraphisms in newborns with skin markers: role of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

E Ausili, G Maresca, L Massimi, L Morgante, C Romagnoli, C Rendeli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cloacal Dysgenesis Sequence in a Preterm Neonate.The American journal of case reports · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Spinal cord ultrasonography of the newborn.Journal of ultrasound · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

E AusiliSpina Bifida Center, Women's and Infant Health Sciences, A. Gemelli Policlinic, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. emanuele.ausili@tin.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6095-1156
G MarescaSpina Bifida Center, Women's and Infant Health Sciences, A. Gemelli Policlinic, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
L MassimiNeurosurgery Department, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
L MorganteSpina Bifida Center, Women's and Infant Health Sciences, A. Gemelli Policlinic, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
C RomagnoliSpina Bifida Center, Women's and Infant Health Sciences, A. Gemelli Policlinic, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
C RendeliSpina Bifida Center, Women's and Infant Health Sciences, A. Gemelli Policlinic, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate occult spinal dysraphisms (OSD) using lumbar ultrasonography (LUS) in newborns presenting with specific skin markers or sacrococcygeal dimple.

methodFrom 2012 to 2015, we performed LUS in newborns with cutaneous stigmata and/or sacroccygeal dimple. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all patients with abnormal ultrasound or features of neurological involvement in order to detect spinal lesions.

resultsWe prospectively evaluated 475 newborns who presented cutaneous stigmata performing LUS during their 4 weeks of life though 439 completed the study. All patients had a follow-up of almost 12 months. Of these, 39 presented abnormal ultrasonography and underwent MRI. In this group, spinal dysraphism was confirmed in 12 patients. When considering skin markers, dermal sinus correlated with higher risk of spinal cord lesions, on the other hand the presence of simple sacral dimple alone denoted a very low risk of occult spinal dysraphism. The simultaneous presence of more skin markers and/or the presence of lumbar ultrasonography abnormality regarding the level of the conus, pulsatility, and the position of the cord, thickness of the filum terminale, or the presence of an intratecal mass, lipoma, or dermal sinus tract indicated the necessity to perform MRI in order to detect spinal cord abnormalities because of higher risk of spinal lesions.

conclusionLUS in newborns with specific skin markers is a valid method to select patients in which MRI can be performed to detect OSD. The presence of a simple sacral dimple alone is a negligible marker for occult neural pathology while the presence of isolated dermal sinus or more than one cutaneous marker could be considered indicative of higher risk of spinal dysraphism.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonography, InterventionalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeural Tube DefectsProspective StudiesSkin AbnormalitiesDermal sinusDimpleLipomaOccultUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID29075839
OpenAlexW2765695612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.