Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075780›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2018

Association of Tumor HER3 Messenger RNA Expression With Panitumumab Efficacy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Jenny F Seligmann, Ace J Hatch, Susan D Richman, Faye Elliott, Bart Jacobs, Sarah Brown, Herbert Hurwitz, Jennifer H Barrett, Philip Quirke, Andrew B Nixon and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Role of EREG/EGFR Pathway in Tumor Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jenny F SeligmannLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England.
Ace J HatchDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Susan D RichmanLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England.
Faye ElliottLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England.
Bart Jacobs
Sarah BrownClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, England.
Herbert HurwitzDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennifer H BarrettLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England.
Philip QuirkeLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England.
Andrew B NixonDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew T SeymourLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England.
Duke Medical Center · USSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (HER1) signaling depends on ligand binding and dimerization with itself or other HER receptors. We previously showed in a randomized trial that high EGFR ligand expression is predictive of panitumumab benefit in advanced colorectal cancer. Tumor expression of HER3 may further refine the RAS wild-type (wt) population benefitting from anti-EGFR agents.

objectiveTo examine HER3 messenger RNA expression as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy in a randomized clinical trial of panitumumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThe study was a prospectively planned retrospective biomarker study of pretreatment samples from the PICCOLO trial that tested the addition of panitumumab to irinotecan therapy in patients with KRAS wt advanced colorectal cancer who experienced failure with prior fluoropyrimidine treatment. HER3 was assessed as a prognostic marker, then as a predictive biomarker in patients with RAS wt, first as a continuous variable and then as a binary (high vs low) variable. Relationship with MEK-AKT pathway mutations and EGFR ligands epiregulin and amphiregulin (EREG/AREG) were also assessed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were response rate and overall survival (OS).

resultsIn 308 patients (mean age at randomization, 61.6 years; 193 men) higher HER3 was weakly prognostic for OS (hazard ratio [HR] per 2-fold change, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99; P = .04) but not PFS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83-1.05; P = .25). Higher HER3 was predictive, being associated with prolonged PFS on irinotecan plus panitumumab (IrPan) (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.82; P < .001), but not irinotecan (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.82-1.13; P = .65) in patients with RAS wt, with significant interaction between biomarker and treatment (P = .001). Similar interaction was seen for OS (P = .004). In an exploratory binary model, dividing the population at the 66th percentile, HER3 was predictive of panitumumab benefit: in patients with high HER3 expression, median PFS was 8.2 months (IrPan) vs 4.4 months (irinotecan) (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.58; P < .001). Patients with low HER3 expression gained no benefit in PFS: 3.3 months (IrPan) vs 4.3 months (irinotecan) (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.67-1.38; P = .84), with significant interaction (P = .002). The binary model was also predictive for OS, with significant interaction (P = .01). Combining HER3 and ligand data, patients with HER3-high, AREG/EREG-high tumors gained markedly from panitumumab (PFS HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11-0.51; P < .005 and OS HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73; P = .004). Conversely, patients with HER3-low, AREG/EREG-low tumors did not benefit (PFS HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.73-1.79; P = .57 and OS HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.92-2.26; P = .11). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: High HER3 expression identified patients with RAS wt who gained markedly from panitumumab, and those who did not, with statistically significant biomarker-treatment interactions for PFS and OS. This finding provides insight into the mechanism of anti-EGFR agents and is of potential clinical utility.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, PharmacologicalAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Association StudiesHumansIrinotecanMaleMiddle AgedPanitumumabPrognosisReceptor, ErbB-3Retrospective StudiesBiomarkers, PharmacologicalBiomarkers, TumorERBB3 protein, humanIrinotecanPanitumumabReceptor, ErbB-3RNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID29075780
PMCPMC5933356
OpenAlexW2765611673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.