Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075755›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2017

Predicting Intelligibility Gains in Dysarthria Through Automated Speech Feature Analysis.

Annalise R Fletcher, Alan A Wisler, Megan J McAuliffe, Kaitlin L Lansford, Julie M Liss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Variable Speech Cueing Effects in Talkers With Parkinson's Disease.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026
    Article
  2. Automated Acoustic Analysis in Parkinson's Disease Using a SmartphoneAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting Intelligibility Gains in Individuals With Dysarthria From Baseline Speech Features.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annalise R FletcherDepartment of Communication Disorders, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Alan A WislerSchool of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe.
Megan J McAuliffeDepartment of Communication Disorders, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Kaitlin L LansfordSchool of Communication Science & Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Julie M LissDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe.

Funding

Perception of dysarthric speech: An objective model of dysarthric speech evaluation with actionable outcomesR01DC006859 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BERISHA, VISAR, LISS, JULIE M · 2004 to 2021
$4.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Behavioral speech modifications have variable effects on the intelligibility of speakers with dysarthria. In the companion article, a significant relationship was found between measures of speakers' baseline speech and their intelligibility gains following cues to speak louder and reduce rate (Fletcher, McAuliffe, Lansford, Sinex, & Liss, 2017). This study reexamines these features and assesses whether automated acoustic assessments can also be used to predict intelligibility gains. Method: Fifty speakers (7 older individuals and 43 with dysarthria) read a passage in habitual, loud, and slow speaking modes. Automated measurements of long-term average spectra, envelope modulation spectra, and Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients were extracted from short segments of participants' baseline speech. Intelligibility gains were statistically modeled, and the predictive power of the baseline speech measures was assessed using cross-validation. Results: Statistical models could predict the intelligibility gains of speakers they had not been trained on. The automated acoustic features were better able to predict speakers' improvement in the loud condition than the manual measures reported in the companion article. Conclusions: These acoustic analyses present a promising tool for rapidly assessing treatment options. Automated measures of baseline speech patterns may enable more selective inclusion criteria and stronger group outcomes within treatment studies.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, AutomatedSpeech AcousticsSpeech IntelligibilityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Decision-MakingCuesDysarthriaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPrognosisReading

Identifiers

PMID29075755
PMCPMC6195072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.