Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075747›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2017

Verbal Working Memory in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Susan Nittrouer, Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, Keri E Low, Joanna H Lowenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Executive functions in preschool and school-age cochlear implant users: do they differ from their hearing peers? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Auditory and cognitive outcomes in children with incomplete partition type II: A comparison with normal cochlear anatomy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of language, attention, and memory skills in children with auditory brainstem implants.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Story Generation and Narrative Retells in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing and Hearing Children.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  8. Spoken Sentence Complexity and Grammar Use in Children with CIs.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The emergence of bifurcated structure in children's language.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Listening comprehension in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants: the role of auditory perception and foundational linguistic and cognitive skills.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Does vestibular loss result in cognitive deficits in children with cochlear implants?Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children: Effects of Auditory Access, Age, and Semantic Context.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan NittrouerThe University of Florida, Gainesville.
Amanda Caldwell-TarrThe University of Florida, Gainesville.
Keri E LowThe University of Florida, Gainesville.
Joanna H LowensteinThe University of Florida, Gainesville.

Funding

Early Development of Children With Hearing LossR01DC006237 · NIDCD · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NITTROUER, SUSAN · 2003 to 2014
$5.0M
Spoken Language in Adolescents with Hearing LossR01DC015992 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NITTROUER, SUSAN · 2017 to 2019
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006237NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Verbal working memory in children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing was examined. Participants: Ninety-three fourth graders (47 with normal hearing, 46 with cochlear implants) participated, all of whom were in a longitudinal study and had working memory assessed 2 years earlier. Method: A dual-component model of working memory was adopted, and a serial recall task measured storage and processing. Potential predictor variables were phonological awareness, vocabulary knowledge, nonverbal IQ, and several treatment variables. Potential dependent functions were literacy, expressive language, and speech-in-noise recognition. Results: Children with cochlear implants showed deficits in storage and processing, similar in size to those at second grade. Predictors of verbal working memory differed across groups: Phonological awareness explained the most variance in children with normal hearing; vocabulary explained the most variance in children with cochlear implants. Treatment variables explained little of the variance. Where potentially dependent functions were concerned, verbal working memory accounted for little variance once the variance explained by other predictors was removed. Conclusions: The verbal working memory deficits of children with cochlear implants arise due to signal degradation, which limits their abilities to acquire phonological awareness. That hinders their abilities to store items using a phonological code.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsMemory, Short-TermSpeech PerceptionAnalysis of VarianceChildDeafnessFemaleHumansIntelligenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental RecallNeuropsychological TestsPhoneticsReaction TimeRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29075747
PMCPMC5945083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.