Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075561›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2017

Using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion MRI.

John Del Gaizo, Neda Mofrad, Jens H Jensen, David Clark, Russell Glenn, Joseph Helpern, Leonardo Bonilha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Machine learning techniques based onFrontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Diverse Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John Del GaizoDepartment of Neurology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1910-2579
Neda MofradDepartment of Neurology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA.
Jens H JensenDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA.
David ClarkDepartment of Neurology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA.
Russell GlennDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA.
Joseph HelpernDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA.
Leonardo BonilhaDepartment of Neurology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is common for patients diagnosed with medial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) to have extrahippocampal damage. However, it is unclear whether microstructural extrahippocampal abnormalities are consistent enough to enable classification using diffusion MRI imaging. Therefore, we implemented a support vector machine (SVM)-based method to predict TLE from three different imaging modalities: mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), and fractional anisotropy (FA). While MD and FA can be calculated from traditional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), MK requires diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI).

methodsThirty-two TLE patients and 36 healthy controls underwent DKI imaging. To measure predictive capability, a fivefold cross-validation (CV) was repeated for 1000 iterations. An ensemble of SVM models, each with a different regularization value, was trained with the subject images in the training set, and had performance assessed on the test set. The different regularization values were determined using a Bayesian-based method.

resultsMean kurtosis achieved higher accuracy than both FA and MD on every iteration, and had far superior average accuracy: 0.82 (MK), 0.68 (FA), and 0.51 (MD). Finally, the MK voxels with the highest coefficients in the predictive models were distributed within the inferior medial aspect of the temporal lobes.

conclusionThese results corroborate our earlier publications which indicated that DKI shows more promise in identifying TLE-associated pathological features than DTI. Also, the locations of the contributory MK voxels were in areas with high fiber crossing and complex fiber anatomy. These traits result in non-Gaussian water diffusion, and hence render DTI less likely to detect abnormalities. If the location of consistent microstructural abnormalities can be better understood, then it may be possible in the future to identify the various phenotypes of TLE. This is important since treatment outcome varies dependent on type of TLE.

Indexed as

Epilepsy, Temporal LobeTemporal LobeAdultAnisotropyBayes TheoremDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedSupport Vector Machinediffusion kurtosis imagingepilepsymachine learningMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)support vector machines

Identifiers

PMID29075561
PMCPMC5651385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.