ArticleEvoDevo2017
Formation and subdivision of the head field in the centipede
Article in EvoDevo, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell sequencing suggests a conserved function of Hedgehog-signalling in spider eye development.EvoDevo · 2024Article
- Review
- Serial Homology and Segment Identity in the Arthropod Head.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Development of the Pre-gnathal Segments in the Milkweed BugFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Expression of the zinc finger transcription factor Sp6-9 in the velvet worm Euperipatoides kanangrensis suggests a conserved role in appendage development in Panarthropoda.Development genes and evolution · 2020Article
- Candidate gene screen for potential interaction partners and regulatory targets of the Hox gene labial in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum.Development genes and evolution · 2020Article
- Developing an integrated understanding of the evolution of arthropod segmentation using fossils and evo-devo.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Expression of NK genes that are not part of the NK cluster in the onychophoran Euperipatoides rowelli (Peripatopsidae).BMC developmental biology · 2019Article
- Early segmentation in the mite Archegozetes longisetosus reveals conserved and derived aspects of chelicerate development.Development genes and evolution · 2018Article
- Evidence for the temporal regulation of insect segmentation by a conserved sequence of transcription factors.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere have been few studies of head patterning in non-insect arthropods, and even in the insects, much is not yet understood. In the fly
resultsWe have investigated the expression dynamics of
conclusionsThe dynamics of early gene expression in the centipede show considerable similarity with that in the beetle, both showing more localised expression of head gap genes than occurs in the fly. This suggests that the broad overlapping domains of head gap genes observed in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.