ArticlePlant methods2017
Rapid in situ
Article in Plant methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multiscale growth atlas of Arabidopsis: linking cell dynamics to organ development.The New phytologist · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Investigating phloem transport dynamics in Arabidopsis through compartmental modelling of positron emission tomography data.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Illuminating the subcellular maze: fluorescence-activated organelle sorting in plant sciences.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Evaluation of GC/MS-BasedMetabolites · 2023Article
- An Arabidopsis GCMS chemical ionization technique to quantify adaptive responses in central metabolism.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- A hybrid inorganic-biological artificial photosynthesis system for energy-efficient food production.Nature food · 2022Article
- The Contribution of Metabolomics to Systems Biology: Current Applications Bridging Genotype and Phenotype in Plant Science.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Tracing metabolic flux through time and space with isotope labeling experiments.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2020Review
- Shoot tip culture: a step towards 13C metabolite flux analysis of sink leaf metabolism.Plant methods · 2019Article
- APlant methods · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional metabolomics approaches face the problem of hidden metabolic phenotypes where only fluxes are altered but pool sizes stay constant. Metabolic flux experiments are used to detect such hidden flux phenotypes. These experiments are, however, time consuming, may be cost intensive, and involve specialists for modeling. We fill the gap between conventional metabolomics and flux modeling. We present rapid stable isotope tracing assays and analysis strategies of
resultsWe present petiole and hypocotyl feeding assays for the rapid in situ feeding (≤ 4 h) of isotopically labeled metabolic precursor to whole
conclusionThe presented feeding assays and data evaluation strategies represent a rapid and easy-to-use tool box for enhanced metabolomics studies that combine differential pool size analysis with screening for differential carbon utilization from defined stable isotope labeled metabolic precursors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.