ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017
Insight of Genus
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in Gut Microbiota and Brain Function in Rats Fed with a copper-overloaded Diet.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Emerging Role of Corynebacterium in Breast Abscesses: Clinical Profiles, Resistance Patterns, and Recommendations.Cureus · 2026Article
- Genomic and phenotypic diversity among taxonomically ambiguous clinical Corynebacterium isolates.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- An underestimated pathogen:Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Review
- A Study on the Changing Law of Bacterial Communities in the Milk of Bactrian Camels with Subclinical Mastitis.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Good Results for PJI Caused byOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Horizontal transmission of symbiotic bacteria and host selective sweep in the giant clamISME communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Metabolic capabilities are highly conserved among human nasal-associatedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- The porcine skin microbiome exhibits broad fungal antagonism.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2024Article
- Host DNA depletion methods and genome-centric metagenomics of bovine hindmilk microbiome.mSphere · 2024Article
- Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: Whole genome sequencing reveals unforeseen and relevant genetic diversity in this pathogen.PloS one · 2024Article
- Assessing the microbial diversity and proximate composition of smoked-fermented bushmeat from four different bushmeat samples.Biotechnologia · 2024Article
- Genomic characterization of themSystems · 2023Article
- Article
- Species- and strain-level diversity of Corynebacteria isolated from human facial skin.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Phytobiotic-Prebiotic Feed Additive Containing a Combination of Carob Pulp, Chicory, and Fenugreek Improve Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, and Fecal Microbiota of Fattening Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Corynebacterium lipophilum sp. nov., a lipophilic bacterium isolated from clinical breast specimens and emended description of the species Corynebacterium pilbarense.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2023Article
- Pathogen Profiles in Outpatients with Non-COVID-19 during the 7th Prevalent Period of COVID-19 in Gunma, Japan.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Comparative Characterization of Immune Response in Sheep with Caseous Lymphadenitis through Analysis of the Whole Blood Transcriptome.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review gathers recent information about genomic and transcriptomic studies in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.