Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075221›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2017

A Review of Consequences of Poverty on Economic Decision-Making: A Hypothesized Model of a Cognitive Mechanism.

Matúš Adamkovič, Marcel Martončik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The globalizability of temporal discounting.Nature human behaviour · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pandemics and marketing: insights, impacts, and research opportunities.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Parent-Adolescent Socialization of Social Class in Low-Income White Families: Theory, Research, and Future Directions.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matúš AdamkovičInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovakia.
Marcel MartončikInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on the issue of poverty affecting economic decision-making. By critically evaluating existing studies, the authors propose a structural model detailing the cognitive mechanism involved in how poverty negatively impacts economic decision-making, and explores evidence supporting the basis for the formation of this model. The suggested mechanism consists of a relationship between poverty and four other factors: (1) cognitive load (e.g., experiencing negative affect and stress); (2) executive functions (e.g., attention, working memory, and self-control); (3) intuition/deliberation in decision-making; and (4) economic decision-making (e.g., time-discounting and risk preference), with a final addition of financial literacy as a covariate. This paper focuses on shortfalls in published research, and delves further into the proposed model.

Indexed as

cognitive loadeconomic decision-makingexecutive functionspovertypoverty traprisk preferencescarcitytime-discounting

Identifiers

PMID29075221
PMCPMC5641572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.