ArticleModel assisted statistics and applications : an international journal2017
A new framework for prediction and variable selection for uncommon events in a large prospective cohort study.
Article in Model assisted statistics and applications : an international journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive model of ischemic optic neuropathy in spinal fusion surgery using a longitudinal medical claims database.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When prediction is a goal, validation utilizing data outside of the prediction effort is desirable. Typically, data is split into two parts: one for a development and one for validation. But this approach becomes less attractive when predicting uncommon events, as it substantially reduces power. When predicting uncommon events within a large prospective cohort study, we propose the use of a nested case-control design, which is an alternative to the full cohort analysis. By including all cases but only a subset of the non-cases, this design is expected to produce a result similar to the full cohort analysis. In our framework, variable selection is conducted and a prediction model is fit on those selected variables in the case-control cohort. Then, the fraction of true negative predictions (specificity) of the fitted prediction model in the case-control cohort is compared to that in the rest of the cohort (non-cases) for validation. In addition, we propose an iterative variable selection using random forest for missing data imputation, as well as a strategy for a valid classification. Our framework is illustrated with an application featuring high-dimensional variable selection in a large prospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.