Surgical regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis.

Mark Steven-Howe, Derek Richards

Abstract readComment

In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

Management of Peri-Implantitis Lesions without the Use of Systemic Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2020
Review
A modified surgical approach for hard and soft tissue reconstruction of severe periimplantitis defects: laser-assisted periimplant defect regeneration (LAPIDER).International journal of implant dentistry · 2020
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Comment on
Surgical Regenerative Treatments for Peri-Implantitis: Meta-analysis of Recent Findings in a Systematic Literature Review.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark Steven-HoweBroadway Dental Care, Broadway, Worcestershire, The School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Pembroke Place, Liverpool and the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Derek RichardsDepartment of Public Health, NHS Forth Valley and Centre for Evidence-based Dentistry, Dental Health Services Research Unit, Dundee Dental Hospital and School Dundee University, Dundee, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sourcesOvid, Medline, PubMed, Embase and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source. Databases were searched from January 2006 to March 2016 and restricted to English, manual searches were also carried out in the relevant major journals.Study selectionTwo reviewers independently selected studies. Human prospective and retrospective observational studies with a minimum sample size of ten implants and involving at least one surgical regenerative treatment method for peri-implantitis were considered. Excluded studies included animal and in vitro studies, patients with uncontrolled systemic disease that put the implant at risk and ceramic or coated implants.Data extraction and synthesisData abstraction and quality appraisal were carried out by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials was used.

Identifiers

PMID29075021

DOI10.1038/sj.ebd.6401256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.