Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29075004›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

From receptor binding kinetics to signal transduction; a missing link in predicting in vivo drug-action.

Indira Nederpelt, Maria Kuzikov, Wilbert E A de Witte, Patrick Schnider, Bruno Tuijt, Sheraz Gul, Adriaan P IJzerman, Elizabeth C M de Lange, Laura H Heitman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Refractory nausea in an 86-year-old patient after surgery.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Indira NederpeltDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maria KuzikovFraunhofer IME Screening Port, Schnackenburgallee 114, D-22525, Hamburg, Germany.
Wilbert E A de WitteDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Patrick SchniderRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Small Molecule Research, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland.
Bruno TuijtDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sheraz GulFraunhofer IME Screening Port, Schnackenburgallee 114, D-22525, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2543-1643
Adriaan P IJzermanDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1182-2259
Elizabeth C M de LangeDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Laura H HeitmanDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands. l.h.heitman@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1381-8464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important question in drug discovery is how to overcome the significant challenge of high drug attrition rates due to lack of efficacy and safety. A missing link in the understanding of determinants for drug efficacy is the relation between drug-target binding kinetics and signal transduction, particularly in the physiological context of (multiple) endogenous ligands. We hypothesized that the kinetic binding parameters of both drug and endogenous ligand play a crucial role in determining cellular responses, using the NK1 receptor as a model system. We demonstrated that the binding kinetics of both antagonists (DFA and aprepitant) and endogenous agonists (NKA and SP) have significantly different effects on signal transduction profiles, i.e. potency values, in vitro efficacy values and onset rate of signal transduction. The antagonistic effects were most efficacious with slowly dissociating aprepitant and slowly associating NKA while the combination of rapidly dissociating DFA and rapidly associating SP had less significant effects on the signal transduction profiles. These results were consistent throughout different kinetic assays and cellular backgrounds. We conclude that knowledge of the relationship between in vitro drug-target binding kinetics and cellular responses is important to ultimately improve the understanding of drug efficacy in vivo.

Indexed as

AprepitantCell Line, TumorHumansKineticsNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsNeurokinin APharmaceutical PreparationsReceptors, Neurokinin-1Signal TransductionSubstance PAprepitantNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsNeurokinin APharmaceutical PreparationsReceptors, Neurokinin-1Substance PTACR1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29075004
PMCPMC5658448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.