Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29074969›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Combining

Arno Kornberg, Ulrike Witt, Martina Schernhammer, Jennifer Kornberg, Gueralp O Ceyhan, Katharina Mueller, Helmut Friess, Katharina Thrum

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Impact of metabolic indices ofJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Patient Selection for Downstaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Liver Transplantation-Adjusting the Odds?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emerging role ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  17. Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arno KornbergDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany. ArnoKornberg@aol.com.
Ulrike WittDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Martina SchernhammerDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Jennifer KornbergDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Klinikum Großhadern, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Gueralp O CeyhanDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Katharina MuellerUniversity of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Helmut FriessDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Katharina ThrumInstitute of Pathology, Helios Klinikum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Up-to-seven (UTS) criteria (sum of tumor size and number not exceeding 7) for indicating liver transplantation (LT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were originally based on explant pathology features and absence of microvascular invasion (MVI).

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationPatient SelectionAgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID29074969
PMCPMC5658419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.